The USFA does not politic, then?
Or Skate Canada is so much powerful than the UFSA than it can take away American skaters' home country advantage.
Alrighty, then. Whatever you say.

It's just my opinion. No need to get touchy. You know this sport is full of it. How can anyone have watched all of the skating and judging in all of the disciplines at this event and not witnessed some head-scratching and eye-rolling scoring results.

Maybe I was somewhat harsh in my overall reaction because C/L were definitely harshly judged. But this is nothing new that U.S. pairs are too often looked down upon. They have gotten the short end of the stick way too many times when it was not warranted. I understand the history because I've researched it and I've also watched skating for a very long time. As far as politicking, all federations engage in politics if they have some clout. But the U.S. is simply not very good at politicking and they don't have as much insider clout as Canada. Of course many factors are involved in the scoring aside from politics, and outcomes are inconsistent from event-to-event, as fans constantly witness.
Canadian pairs tend to be given more cred because they've historically enjoyed a bit more major success than U.S. teams, aside from the 19 years when Canadian pairs suffered a World and Olympic podium drought while U.S. teams, including Starbuck/Shelley, Tai/Randy and the Carruthers were battling for podium spots against dominating Russian teams, and usually grabbing at least bronze medals until Tai/Randy finally won Worlds in 1979. It wasn't until 1983 and 1984 that Underhill/Martini of Canada finally broke Canada's 19-year-drought with first a bronze medal at Worlds, and the following year a World championship. U/M passed Canada's baton to Brasseur/Eisler, and then Sale/Pelletier came along. Meanwhile, U.S. pairs remained fairly competitive winning bronze on occasion, and a rare silver medal in 1998 by Meno/Sand. Ina/Zimmerman were the last U.S. pair to make the World podium in 2002 (bronze). And then, Chinese & Russian teams, along with the innovative German team of Savchenko/Szolkowy took over. The U.S. did have some competitive teams for awhile longer, as did Canada, but no U.S. team could break through past 6th position at Worlds in the years after 2002. Eventually, Meagan/Eric broke through for Canada to win Worlds twice, post Dube/Davison failing to go further than winning bronze at Worlds in 2008.
The thing I will never forget is how the U.S. team of Evora/Ladwig weren't given their due over the mistakes made by Canadian teams who enjoyed more rep and expectation at the 2010 Olympics.
In any case, KMT/MM have come a long way since they partnered and I respect them, and I do cheer for them. They were the best in the sp, but not all of their elements have the quality of Sui/Han's elements when S/H are at their best, and even when they are rusty. I simply feel that both KMT/MM and Sui/Han were overscored in the sp. In the fp, KMT/MM were a bit more tight and shaky, especially on one of their lifts. Michael has a way to go to continue improving his partnering skills. Plus, if KMT/MM were in the sp suddenly going to make that kind of leap in their scores internationally, then C/L also deserved to slightly edge ahead of Peng/Jin, especially in the sp (or at least the scores should have been much closer between C/L and P/J in the sp). While C/L still have work to do re continuing to improve the quality of their elements, they have better programs than KMT/MM and P/J this season. Plus, C/L were not given enough credit for their excellent presentation skills.
BTW, the U.S. is currently in the 17th year of a World and Olympic podium drought. I think it's about time for that situation to change!