US ranking as of now
Liu > Bell > Chen > Glenn > Thorngren - Tennell ?
Bell's results at Rosetelcom shows Tennell has a chance to make the Olympics team
she needs to compete in some B event to grease on some rusty motor skills before competing Nationals.
Tennell will not be competing internationally before Nationals. She was withdrawn last week from Golden Spin, which is the last Senior B before Nats.
Here are the current Group placements for the US Women:
Women
Group 2 -
- Alysa Liu (205.74 Cranberry;
219.24 CS Lombardia; 207.40 CS Nebelhorn; 206.53 SCI; 202.90 NHK)
Group 3 -
- Mariah Bell (179.42 Cranberry; 190.79 IdF; 210.35 Rostelecom; CS Golden Spin)
- Karen Chen (208.63 Worlds 2021; 173.00 CS ACI; 202.49 CS Finlandia; 183.41 SCI; 194.00 IdF)
Group 4 -
- Amber Glenn (
Cranberry; 183.46 CS Finlandia; 201.02 SkAm; 175.83 NHK)
- Bradie Tennell* (197.81 Worlds 2021;
US Classic; SkAm; GP Italia; CS Austria; CS Warsaw; CS Golden Spin)
- Lindsay Thorngren (181.45 JGP Courchevel 1; 193.77 JGP Ljubljana; 184.40 CS Warsaw; JGPF)
Others with International Assignments
Gabriella Izzo (
Cranberry; 182.76 US Classic; 155.78 CS Warsaw; CS Golden Spin)
Starr Andrews (155.25 CS ACI; 177.63 SkAm; 157.35 CS Austria;
IdF)
Audrey Shin (174.73 Cranberry; 172.46 CS Lombardia; 160.78 SkAm; 169.99 CS Austria)
Sierra Venetta (159.72 Cranberry; 177.40 US Classic)
Hanna Harrell* (CS Golden Spin)
Honestly, I'd probably put Thorngren ahead of Glenn and only a bit behind Chen. Lindsay & Amber have each had one Challenger and Lindsay outscored Amber; Lindsay had 2 JGPs and Amber had 2 GPs - Lindsay's JGP scores were both higher than one of Amber's GP scores. Sure, Amber is trying the 3A but so is Lindsay and their success rate is about the same. Chen's been a bit more hit and miss but, again, their scores are pretty comparable, though Karen's PCS potential is much higher right now.