How does one define a successful debut for a transitioning junior team? This is why I wanted to track the teams from this season. Because so often we only see the very top junior team(s) on the GP and often their results are considered "unsuccessful." (And when they
are considered successful, often their
second senior season is considered unsuccessful). But there are so many problems with that analysis. With only 8 teams on the GP and two of them taken by host teams, you could wind up finishing dead last behind a top-eleven team in the World on the GP two years ago. Exactly how unsuccessful is that? This season, we've had the chance for better perspective on the Grand Prix, which is great to see.
And, as we've all seen, the scores on the GP tend to be tougher than the Challenger Series (not at the very early season Challengers, but in general, yes). And early Challenger scores tend to be much lower than late-season Challenger scores. On top of that, we wind up with a crazy event like Tallinn Trophy, where miraculously 20 of 21 teams suddenly earn a season's best all at the same competition.
Plus, clearly, some teams have a very deep field at home, while others are sent out here, there, and everywhere because their country has no one else to send or has one high-level team paving the way. (And it doesn't hurt to have a coach who is taking his/her stable somewhere already). Therefore, making the post season--while being a success in its own right--doesn't accurately compare a team to others who didn't.
So what makes a transition for a junior team a success?
First & foremost, I would say:
earning a second event. Not on the GP, but a second international event, period.
Of the dance teams I tracked this season, only four teams earned a second Challenger/GP/major international event. This means everyone else
never had the chance to demonstrate international improvement. And that is a problem because there's very good reason to believe their scores would have improved. All the teams that went to two or more events on my list seem to have averaged about a 9 point gain during the season.
Which, of course, is another criteria.
Improvement. It's hard to see the improvement for teams like Sales & Wamtseeker and Biechler & Dodge, whose end-of-season scores are National ones. But both teams came out looking pretty good relative to expectations in those end-of-season contests, certainly when you look at their final placements at Nationals and consider those disappointing early season scores. The improvement was there, but it's hard for the larger dance community to see it without those international events.
Hitting your levels. The big difference for Pogrebinsky & Benoit and Lauriault & Le Gac this season was hitting their levels. They typically--and IMO fairly--scored lower in PCS than more experienced teams who just edged them out for placements. But these young teams hit levels over those teams; and in the long run, that can make all the difference.
I'm rooting for McNamara & Carpenter

.