The original KSU statement wasn’t completely neutral, in that it mentioned senior vs. junior and gender, and it could have implied that it was part of the same incident, where they could have just given a tally of Training Camp Gone Wild
Skater A, suspended for drinking alcohol in the dorm. Later clarified as also for sexual harassment.
Skater B, suspended for drinking alcohol in the dorm.
Skater C, reprimanded for visiting the opposite gender dorm.
Coach D, acting as chaperone was sanctioned (or whatever they did) because this happened under their watch.
This would have made them look bad in the short run, though, not just three bad apples.
No one needed to know who had filed the appeals, their representatives or the athletes, just whether or not there was an appeal.
However, the second report, where they tied the skaters together was wrong, IMO. It’s not like the press would not have been relentless, or that their identities wouldn’t have become known, or that the athletes wouldn’t have made their own statements and outed themselves and each other. But the Federation shouldn’t have, adult or minor, IMO, unless there was a legal obligation to disclose a sexual harassment or other interpersonal charge.