Once again, it is indicated for heart disease - chest pain and heart attack. Otherwise, it's a performance enhancing substance (see my original post earlier). And there is no evidence that has been presented that Bobrova had this prescribed for a heart condition. She did not appear to have any medical reason to take this; therefore, her use of it (recall that she admitted to using it last fall) was likely for performance enhancement.
As for other conditions like asthma, there are many drugs available for treatment (and methods of administration) that don't violate these rules. And I don't get the impression that this drugs was used by athletes for medical indications considering someone who has a heart attack or angina is highly unlikely to be a Olympic athlete.
Very strange quotes. It sounds like he's only sorry that it happened now?
And it was perfectly legal when she took it. Or should all legal performance enhancing substances of any kind whatsoever be banned? Caffeine, for starters?And perhaps I'd be willing to give her the benefit of the doubt more if she hadn't admitted to using this performance enhancing substance for no apparent medical reason previously and voluntarily.
Sharapova has just announced that she failed a test at the Australian Open for the same thing.
I can only see 3 explanations:
- She intentionally doped herself, and hoped she wouldn't get caught, and is now lying.
- A mistake were made. Either by the doctor, the person who helped the doctor, the person who supplied the doctor, the shipper, the labeller, the medicine production. (I include 'the doctor was clueless about the WADA change' here).
- Some conspiracy involving someone intentionally doped her to get rid of them at worlds and/or wanting to destroy their career.
Which of these sound more likely? hmm...
EDIT: removed weird. I guess in could be a straight forward, logical conspiracy.
I believe a mistake was made by someone; we may not know who.
There can be any reasons for using a heart medication; it's not necessary to have a heart condition for it. Some doctors prescribe low dose aspirin to people that have no heart condition whatsoever. I am not a doctor but I have heard of medicines for one part of the body being used for another. We don't know why she was taking this medicine. Unless you have expertise in the field, all this speculation is pointless.
Somewhat related: Maria Sharapova, the tennis player, also just announced today she tested positive for the same drug, meldonium:
https://twitter.com/WTA_insider/status/706934317830709249
Somewhat related: Maria Sharapova, the tennis player, also just announced today she tested positive for the same drug, meldonium:
https://twitter.com/WTA_insider/status/706934317830709249
This is not low dose aspirin. it is a drug specifically designed to treat angina and heart attack and has only been experimented with in neurological disorders. A person needing this drug for its approved medical indications is highly unlikely to be a top level Olympic athlete. It has been widely stated that this drug has been used in Russia for performance enhancement. You can make all the excuses you like, but Bobrova wouldn't be a competitive athlete with the disease level that this drug is indicated for. The drug was likely being used for performance enhancement, and it was in her system after it was made illegal. With a half-life of only several hours, it had to have been administered to her during the competition. No matter how well anyone thinks of Bobrova, the simple fact it that is being in her system constituted doping in the Fed's eyes, and she has to pay the price, even if she didn't do this consciously and someone else did it to her.
Well, I don't know where you live, but in my country you still need a damn good reason to prescribe someone aspirin (doesn't have to be the heart, can be anything from clotting disorder to arterial stenosis) - which is still a blood thinner and can have serious side effects.There can be any reasons for using a heart medication; it's not necessary to have a heart condition for it. Some doctors prescribe low dose aspirin to people that have no heart condition whatsoever. I am not a doctor but I have heard of medicines for one part of the body being used for another. We don't know why she was taking this medicine. Unless you have expertise in the field, all this speculation is pointless.
People should get off their high horses. It may be a shock to many, but if a drug is LEGAL and it has the effect of enhancing an athlete's performance, they will take it. Athletes want to win and if they can take a LEGAL supplement to help them win, there is nothing wrong in taking it
Oh, it could have - imagine if Stolbova had also had a positive test!holy crap. down goes my tennis hero.
can this day get worse?
It's not an illegal substance, it's a (newly) banned substance in sports. I feel that this is still a distinction worth making. YMMV.I'm sorry if presenting medical evidence is a "high horse" in your opinion, but it seems a lot of people here cannot accept that she was disciplined for having an illegal substance in her body and are determined to insist that she is either being wronged or is an innocent who had something evil done to her.
Well, I don't know where you live, but in my country you still need a damn good reason to prescribe someone aspirin (doesn't have to be the heart, can be anything from clotting disorder to arterial stenosis) - which is still a blood thinner and can have serious side effects.
Unless someone suffers from coronary heart disease or similar conditions, there does not seem to exist a good reason to take this drug, legal or not. Physicians who advocate it break their oath and athletes who take it are either very naive or have lost a feeling for fairness.
Sharapova's statement she says she made a mistake, so she is not making any claim that she did not knowingly take the drug. So the apparently its not that unlikely that an athlete might do this?
Since a number of athletes in different sports are reporting something similar, I wonder if there was a communication problem of some kind? Of course the change in the legal/illegal status of the drug won't apply to athletes who were not taking it at all.
Thanks. Sharapova just ended her press conference - I've started a thread in Other Sports: http://www.fsuniverse.net/forum/ind...-she-has-tested-positive-for-meldonium.98109/Sharapova has just announced that she failed a test at the Australian Open for the same thing. She says she was originally prescribed it for heart issues 10 years ago.
Oh, it could have - imagine if Stolbova had also had a positive test!
(certainly I have no reason to believe that this is a possibility)
It's not an illegal substance, it's a (newly) banned substance in sports. I feel that this is still a distinction worth making. YMMV.
Well, in Sharapova's case it's extremely weird situation.Sharapova's statement she says she made a mistake, so she is not making any claim that she did not knowingly take the drug. So the apparently its not that unlikely that an athlete might do this?