What good are transitions if they aren't difficult? What good are transitions if they are ploys to cover defects? What good are transitions if they are visually jarring in a negative way? What good are transitions if they do not match the music?
I tell you what: if one is to be overly simplistic, it seems that this scoring system rewards the highest base values and people who rotate jumps. Obviously, falls do have a negative impact, but if your base value is far above that of your competitors and you manage to rotate all or most of your jumps, you are richly rewarded, and magically your PCS are elevated. I don't agree with much of that. I can go to a speech competition in a foreign country and tackle some extremely challenging text that native speakers won't attempt, but if their pronunciation, logic, etc. is clear and I am tripping over words or just throwing the kitchen sink into my speech just to make it jam-packed, should I score higher because it has a "higher base value"? Come on.
Mind you, Eteri's skaters often hit their jumps and they do have some good qualities. In addition, they are all different people, and I have enjoyed some of them and their performances, but in reference to what I have written above, I don't like seeing things like Valieva get such a high score for her triple axel when it was an adjective that rhymes with Smitty. If you don't execute, I don't care very much about "other bullet points." I find such a system shameful. Does a runway model get positive press and probable future gigs because she makes a grandiose entrance to the catwalk but then trips trying to do a fancy turn? I think not. Sheesh. Quality matters. And to echo what so many people post here: PCS are NOT TES.
To throw something "nice" in here for anyone who finds this post too negative or surly: I really, really enjoyed Alena Kostornaia when she had her stellar 2019-2020 season, and though I haven't seen all of her competitions in the seasons since, I have found her undervalued.