For the host skate America spot?
As you just told me earlier today, host federation spots are not bound by any ISU rule or regulation so I only skimmed all of your points.
Precisely - they can do whatever they want - so, they could have assigned Sonja Hilmer to that SkAm host TBD spot if they wanted.
Nationals, Sarah was fourth, should’ve been third possibly and I believe Elyce 10th
Who cares? That was nearly 8 months ago. All of the women who were in the SB Top 75 were included in the Cranberry Cup skate-off, regardless of their Nats placement.
But, if you want to take a look at their 2023-24 season results, I'll be happy to indulge you.
Cranberry - Elyce 4th 162.58, Sarah 6th 161.11
JGP Istanbul - Elyce 4th - 179.16
JGP Gdansk - Sarah 6th - 168.69
JGP Yerevan - Elyce 2nd - 176.11
CS Warsaw Cup - Elyce - 3rd 177.50
US Nats - Sarah 4th 193.37, Elyce 10th 173.11
4CCs - Elyce - 8th 173.98
Sarah's Nationals result was, clearly, an outlier based upon her results up to that point in time. Elyce hadn't really had a break-out competition like that with a 190+ score until this year's Cranberry, but her overall international results were solid and steady - and she won the silver medal at her 2nd JGP. Should those results and her clear improvement since last winter go unrewarded just because she had one really poor competition at 2024 Nats?
That's a pretty rich notion coming from the biggest Amber Glenn uberfan around. Look how long it's taken her to start producing results despite implosion after implosion and more opportunities than any of us care to count.
The fact that Sarah has won the cran and second at the Lomb and beaten the world champion. I mean what else does she have to do?
Well, the SkAm host TBD decision was made before either Sarah competed at Lombardia this week or Elyce competes at Nebelhorn next week, so the Lombardia results are irrelevant.
Sarah won Cranberry by 2.5 points - and Elyce beat her by 4.5 in the SP. Yes, Sarah made up the difference in the FS but this wasn't some slam dunk win, no matter how you would like to characterize it as such by adding in the Lombardia results to bolster your rather weak argument.
And an International panel of judges are giving her stellar PCS in her first year senior
Just an FYI - Elyce received higher PCS in both the SP and FS at Cranberry.
Also, technically, this is their 2nd senior season - both of them competed at Cranberry last season - see my review of their int'l results from last season above.
And also, I think that Sarah has Grand Prix final potential in her first year. Completely and truly. And because of that, I don’t want to hope that maybeeeee a skater drops out of skate Canada or France. I will risk my CVS running out of Halloween peanut butter cups, but I won’t risk this.
Well, by your logic, Elyce also has GPF potential in her first full year as a senior. Look at her upward trajectory in score from last season to August. It's similar to Sarah's.
Having said that, their GPF potential is a stretch if you're looking at just their Cranberry results, which is what the USFS was basing the SkAm decision upon. Last season, Sarah's 196.42 would have earned her bronze at SkAm, silver at GP Espoo, or bronze at NHK. Elyce's 193.99 would have earned her silver at GP Espoo (heh - and both would have knocked your girl off that podium). 2nd & 3rd at two GPs may slide in for the GPF but it also may not, depending on how the rest of the results shake out - and also, generally speaking, GP scores tend to be lower than Challenger scores which means, realistically, placements in the 4th-6th range are more likely than podium finishes for either Sarah or Elyce.
As it is, you are being incredibly selfish about this in favor of one skater over another who has demonstrated that she is equally deserving of a GP assignment. And you're losing sight of the bigger picture. This is the season where they are setting themselves up (both of them) to be contenders for the Olympic team next season. There isn't any need to rush this - and it's fantastic that they've both earned GP assignments given their relative lack of international exposure.
And the fact that after she had such a stellar nationals performance, USFSA basically said too-da-loo to her. See ya next year toots, dont call us, we’ll call you. Lol
Again, her Nats result was great but it was, until Cranberry, an aberration. It was well outside the range she'd scored internationally during the season leading up to Nats. But, honestly, so much of this feels like recency bias. Where is your continued righteous outrage and irritation with the USFS for not even sending her to Jr Worlds last season after her spectacular Nats result? Maybe, just maybe, be happy she's getting the opportunities now and, clearly, making the most of them? She's putting herself firmly in the conversation for Milano-Cortina and that's ultimately what matters, not the outside chance of making the GPF this year.
on a side note these Trader Joe’s overnight oats, pumpkin spice are really good
Pumpkin spice is so basic. Get it together, sweets.