Let's call them "The Better Wang/Liu" or the "Only Wang/Liu to Exist".Wang/Liu
Luan Bo has retired and Sui has not taken over (she is still choreographing for the Qiqihar teams, though not as much as before. I also wanna yell at her for the Bolero program but that's another story...). I don't want to panic and say that the promising babies are screwed but that's exactly how I feel.I had not realized Luan Bo had retired.
I don't know if Sui should immediately take over, I don't believe she has any coaching experience. I totally thought it would eventually happen, but then I also thought Luan Bo would stay and let her be the "apprentice". (yes, I see you think Luan Bo's replacement are pretty crap, but that doesn't mean we should want someone who's also completely untested as their replacement)Luan Bo has retired and Sui has not taken over (she is still choreographing for the Qiqihar teams, though not as much as before. I also wanna yell at her for the Bolero program but that's another story...). I don't want to panic and say that the promising babies are screwed but that's exactly how I feel.
Actually, my point is not whether Sui should or should not take over, but that she doesn't appear to want to take over. I think she's more keen on staying purely as a choreographer rather than a coach.I don't know if Sui should immediately take over, I don't believe she has any coaching experience. I totally thought it would eventually happen, but then I also thought Luan Bo would stay and let her be the "apprentice". (yes, I see you think Luan Bo's replacement are pretty crap, but that doesn't mean we should want someone who's also completely untested as their replacement)
She should test a personal project junior pair first. Like IDK if it'll happen, but that's what I'd have made her do this season.
Why do you think Zhang Tianci is a bad coach?Guan is even worse than Zhang Tianci.
Wonder why Han Bing doesn't want to coach pairs skating anymore.
He is a technician. Mastered all the triples when he was a single skater.Why do you think Zhang Tianci is a bad coach?
He stabilized triple toe loop for Wang and Zhu
Also, Zhang Tianci has been coaching for quite a long time after his retirement as pairs skater with Peng.Guan is even worse than Zhang Tianci.
Wonder why Han Bing doesn't want to coach pairs skating anymore.
Why do you think Zhang Tianci is a bad coach?
Because Guan can't teach anything at all. He was Zhao Hongbo's sidekick and the national team's pairs jump coach during the Beijing quad (and we all know how great the Chinese pairs' jumps are...). He has zero clue on pairs technique having never done pairs himself. All the teams that he's had under him (Wang/Huang, Zhang/Yang, Wang/Jia etc.) never did well. He messes the pairs technique more than stabilize them imo. He's also responsible for the doomed-to-fail cross-discipline talent selection program that finds older kids from gymnastics or other sports and get them into skating and pairs. It's been proven over and over that this just does not work but he was still at it post-Beijing I guess because there's some sort of funding associated with this kind of program.I'm actually more curious as to why Guan is worse than ZTC?
I am fine with calling Guan useless, but I was confused as to what he'd done to be called worse than someone who'd paired up a 10 year old with a 23 year old...I don't know if I would say Guan is worse than ZTC. One is useless and the other is cray. I would not touch either with a stick.
ofc pairs is more than just jumps but sbs cleanliness and throws even separate the good from great teams. lots of teams with good pair elements but lacking those like Panfilova/Rylov did well in lower-level comps but honestly stood no chance in winning serious senior medals. hocke/kunkel faced similar problems with the 3S all season as they lost out on numerous podiums because lack of consistent sbs 3. Also having a sbs 3 oftentimes, but not always, requires a certain benchmark of PCS.Sorry but pairs is much more than just jumps. I disagree that having strong jumps is "good foundation" and "potential" for pairs. Here's my take on the pairs event:
Same can be said for teams with good SBS and lacking pair elements. What's the point of junior pairs event summary that mainly revolves around the quality of SBS?lots of teams with good pair elements but lacking those like Panfilova/Rylov did well in lower-level comps but honestly stood no chance in winning serious senior medals.
So yes they need to work on everything hmmm. I would say quite the opposite. Zhang/Feng and Guo/Zhang have really good foundations and need to work on their SBS. It's amusing to me how often people praise new pairs made of 2 single skaters and their amazing SBS jumps despite low quality or non-existent pair elements saying "they have so much potential". On the other hand pairs with good pair elements and weak jumps often get "they won't do well because they're bad at jumps". Why do people assume it's easier to train and gain pair elements than jumps? and hence think that pairs with good SBS and weak pair elements have more potential than pairs with good pair elements and weak SBS? That is simply not the case. If you like watching jumps then stick to singles.they need to work on twists lifts throws and death spiral but they have rly good foundations
This is my issue with people saying Mishina/Galliamov were amazing put in the most succinct way btw, lol.and hence think that pairs with good SBS and weak pair elements have more potential than pairs with good pair elements and weak SBS?
Please do~ Most teams are recycling their programs from last season so it might be familiar if you've seen them before, but Zhang/Feng's new SP is very charming with an interesting music choice. I'm kinda meh on Zhang/Huang's new SP but at least it's better than Bolero (!!!). Gosh I'm so disappointed that the only new FP we see here had to be freaking BOLEROI'm definitely going to have to check out the play list for all these junior teams later this weekend. I'm excited to jump into the discussion and evaluation of these teams!
Okay, the age difference for Guo/Zhang isn't so bad. I'd question whether not she's really 13 but then I remember my younger niece was super-tiny and baby-faced until she was probably about 17, so I guess I can't really question if Guo is 13 or not.Regarding the SBS spins: in typical (incompetent) Cfed style they failed to update the domestic rules. The results from the congress is that pairs should do a pair spin in the short and SBS spin the free (which is what the scoring system is set to) but the domestic rules still had SBS spin in the SP. So when the tech panel keyed in SBS spin in the short everyone's spin became an invalid element....(and then they panicked and took the tech box out of the screen for some of the teams...)
Anyway, I think I should've posted the ages of the junior pairs, just to put things in perspective:
Zhang/Huang: 17/23 (was an age limbo team before the new age rules passed)
Zhang/Feng: 13/16
Yang/Deng: 16/19
Guo/Zhang: 13/17
Wang/Liu: 16/19
Chen/Wang: unknown/19 (she's probably the tiniest out of all the pair girls so I'm guessing she leans towards the lower end probably ~13)
Guo/Zhang's age difference is not bad at all despite the size difference. He's just really tall but obviously still has a baby face. I don't see why that's an issue since she obviously still has to grow a lot.
Chen/Wang's program was a bit iffy because they recycled Wang's program with his previous partner Shi last season...(Shi was informed and apparently unhappy about it but they still went ahead and used the program). This felt kinda weird. Here is the program with the original team. This program was already very well received last year.
I think the general expectations for Zhang/Huang is much higher than a top 10 finishI do agree, btw, with your assessment about Zhang/Huang probably not scoring as well internationally as they did here based upon what they showed. Depending on how much improvement has been made by some of the European teams that were at JWC last year, they may manage a top 10 finish (presuming 3 US teams, 3 Canadian teams, Sierova/Khobta, Napolitano/Comi are all in the top 10, that leaves room for 2 other teams).
Eh, I don't seem them being super-competitive on the senior scene if she can't land the throws consistently. They are definitely NOT on the same level as Metelkina/Berulava last season - and they're not even really close to Flores/Wang either, nor Kemp/Elizarov if they're healthy. They may be competitive with Ariano Kent/Laliberte Laurent, Desrochers/Thrasher, and Sierova/Khobta. But that also doesn't take into account what sort of progress teams like Napolitano/Comi, Shimizu/Honda, Telemaque/Coulon, and several US teams have made. I wouldn't rule them out to make the JGPF but I certainly wouldn't put them in the JWC podium contenders list (Williams/Lewer have already said they'd be open to another JWC this season if they don't make any of the other ISU Championships teams for the USA).I think the general expectations for Zhang/Huang is much higher than a top 10 finishMost people are expecting jgpf/jwc podium even, which is not out of the question should they go clean but their consistency isn't great. They (him, in particular) are as prone to messing up the SBS as you would expect from a Chinese pair. And now their throw, which used to be very solid, seems wobblier than before too.
Personally I don't really care for Zhang/Huang because I don't believe 23 year olds should be in juniors competing with the babies. He's very much like a Chinese Berulava to me, having competed on the JGP 5 years ago and also in senior internationals. I would much rather the spot go to the younger ones so that they get international exposure even if they are not as good as Zhang/Huang. These age rules are just taking away opportunity from actual juniors imo.
I agree that the general Chinese audience overrate Zhang/Huang's potential on the international scene. That's why I say I would rather see the babies get the opportunity to go out in juniors. Their tech content on paper is probably on par with the top teams you mentioned here minus M/B, the thing with juniors is always who skates best on the day.Eh, I don't seem them being super-competitive on the senior scene if she can't land the throws consistently. They are definitely NOT on the same level as Metelkina/Berulava last season - and they're not even really close to Flores/Wang either, nor Kemp/Elizarov if they're healthy. They may be competitive with Ariano Kent/Laliberte Laurent, Desrochers/Thrasher, and Sierova/Khobta. But that also doesn't take into account what sort of progress teams like Napolitano/Comi, Shimizu/Honda, Telemaque/Coulon, and several US teams have made. I wouldn't rule them out to make the JGPF but I certainly wouldn't put them in the JWC podium contenders list (Williams/Lewer have already said they'd be open to another JWC this season if they don't make any of the other ISU Championships teams for the USA).
Napolitano/Comi, Shimizu/Honda, Telemaque/Coulon
As you've said we don't know what progress they've made, but as of last season Zhang/Huang's tech on paper is definitely way above these teams (again, they should be because he shouldn't be in juniors). I can see T/C and W/L probably make the most progress from these teams. Napolitano/Comi, Shimizu/Honda are in the "good at jumps, bad at pair elements" category which imo is harder to see significant progress in pairs within a short time.Williams/Lewer
I think you might be surprised at both Napolitano/Comi and Shimizu/Honda's progress since JWC. NapComi are training at IceLab at least part time and I expect they've probably made rapid progress on their pairs elements training with all those top teams there. ShiHon are in Oakville with Bruno Marcotte and there are some good teams in that group that will help push them with getting their pairs elements. Six months is an eternity in junior pairs. Flores/Wang made rapid progress between 2023 Nats and the JGP last fall.As you've said we don't know what progress they've made, but as of last season Zhang/Huang's tech on paper is definitely way above these teams (again, they should be because he shouldn't be in juniors). I can see T/C and W/L probably make the most progress from these teams. Napolitano/Comi, Shimizu/Honda are in the "good at jumps, bad at pair elements" category which imo is harder to see significant progress in pairs within a short time.
I eagerly await their performances. I think this JGP season will be very interesting for pairs, way way better than the drought that was two seasons agoI think you might be surprised at both Napolitano/Comi and Shimizu/Honda's progress since JWC. NapComi are training at IceLab at least part time and I expect they've probably made rapid progress on their pairs elements training with all those top teams there. ShiHon are in Oakville with Bruno Marcotte and there are some good teams in that group that will help push them with getting their pairs elements. Six months is an eternity in junior pairs. Flores/Wang made rapid progress between 2023 Nats and the JGP last fall.
I was kinda confused when I saw this, because I don't remember Zhang/Feng's throw to ever be really small. Thought I remembered wrong, until I saw this photo. Most definitely not a small throw, certainly not by junior standards (compared to those like say, Shimuzu/Honda where she literally jumps by herself with him lightly touching her hips)the throw was small, even for a junior team.
YU Xinyi & LIU Tianyi (Gold, Age eligible for JGP, Xinyu Liu is one of their coaches now)