AxelAnnie
Like a small boat on the ocean...
- Messages
- 14,463
Not to be obtuse, but how is the US able to be so strong in dance and yet so weak in pairs? Is it a practice time issue? I'm assuming dance lifts, spins and step sequences are easier to practice on crowded sessions, while pairs elements require renting out the whole sheet of ice? I clearly have no clue what goes into this, but it is striking how the US is so strong in one discipline and weak in the other.
I have a slightly different take on this. Beginning with Lang & Tchernychev & Silverstein/Pekarek, ice dance moved away from the angsty, rolling on the ice, dramatic (and kind of ridiculous) style of the Russians and Europeans, to a more accessible (for the viewer) programs that looked like skating and dance. The North Americans followed that theme, and the Russians et al did not. By the time the angst was less important, the North Americans had pulled ahead.
As to Pairs..........they all (petty much) received a memo that the jumps didn't really count. You could fall, and get points, you could look like you were jumping and get points. How many American Pairs teams actually, reliably land their jumps? Um.........none? I am not sure any teams reliably land the jumps except for Sui/Han and S/M & D/H - not a lot. So the US got left in the dust, thinking they could bet by with sloppy jumps....and the world marched ahead........