litenkyckling
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 797
such a shame that C/P's season will likely end at Nationals because I'd love to see how these programmes would look in March
perhaps but they are FinnishT/V’s FD is my favorite FD of the year. I think it sets such a stunning mood. To each his own!
I know lol. I was just saying I think they deserved bronze in Espoo and it wasn’t all home cooking.perhaps but they are Finnish
I would respectfully disagree here - I don’t think their FD was 4+ points better than cpom here. Maybe they did deserve the bronze by a smaller margin but I think the judging here for both US teams here wasn’t in line with the way the rest of the competition was judged.I know lol. I was just saying I think they deserved bronze in Espoo and it wasn’t all home cooking.
I know everyone loves the browns and I do too but if I had to pair her with someone else it would be Ethan PealI am not convinced that C/P won't win at least bronze at Nats. Their programs are great and I hope they are able to work hard and get them polished. Judges are giving them some pretty good GOE. Browns don't need to be anywhere close to the podium. In the pbp thread for Espoo it was suggested they get other partners, I agree. She looks like she would do better with a taller partner.
So basically we have CarPon, GrePar, P/B, and the Browns and who else? In the mix after C/B and H/B. I feel like I am missing more but I can't think right now.
Ok I checked...Bratti/Som and McN/Spir might be in the mix for bronze though I doubt it. We also have Ces/Yeh, Ling/Wein, but neither seem there yet for me. The question is how will the two young teams of Zing/Kol and Kon/Sche figure in? They are both pretty stellar with awesome potential.
Flores/Desyatov are also very much a part of the conversation.I am not convinced that C/P won't win at least bronze at Nats. Their programs are great and I hope they are able to work hard and get them polished. Judges are giving them some pretty good GOE. Browns don't need to be anywhere close to the podium. In the pbp thread for Espoo it was suggested they get other partners, I agree. She looks like she would do better with a taller partner.
So basically we have CarPon, GrePar, P/B, and the Browns and who else? In the mix after C/B and H/B. I feel like I am missing more but I can't think right now.
Ok I checked...Bratti/Som and McN/Spir might be in the mix for bronze though I doubt it. We also have Ces/Yeh, Ling/Wein, but neither seem there yet for me. The question is how will the two young teams of Zing/Kol and Kon/Sche figure in? They are both pretty stellar with awesome potential.
Oh yes, I actually meant them instead of Kon/Sche although I like them as well.Flores/Desyatov are also very much a part of the conversation.
I am not convinced that C/P won't win at least bronze at Nats.
You are most likely correct in that.I do not think it is reasonable to expect any medals above bronze to be in play in ice dance this year.
I liked your analysis there and I can see where CarPon were judged pretty fair, I just like them so much, I see them through rose-colored glasses. Being a fan is harder than judging in that respect! I do agree that G/P outskated H/B today, Kaitlyn looks hurt and it shows. Jean Luc is perfection but they are a team and he can't do everything.I watched without participating in PBP because friends came over and I forced them to shut up and watch. Then I had to pay attention closely to the performances because then they made me explain all the elements and what made one good and what made one bad outside what was obvious to anyone who can see.
Let me just say that I totally agreed with most of the scores and the spread. It was clear that Gilles/Poirier were just on fire and skated that program with more conviction than Hawayek/Baker who skated much smaller than G/P. I don’t think every individual point differences in PCS adding together and factored by 2.00 made the PCS differential unreasonable at all. As for GOE, well, I’d have to go back to every element again but I felt that G/P had much more ease and better execution of almost all of their elements and should have reflected in GOE differences.
Same story with Turkklia/Versluis v. Carreira/Ponomarenko. CarPon had a great opening lift and they are clearly trying hard to get in-character…but that seemed slow, self-conscious, and it gave a laborious, heavy, and effortful look all-around in comparison to TurkVers who were so fast, effervescent, and went in and out of their elements with much more ease and ability on display. For those of you who disagree and prefer CarPon, just know the judges did put CarPon ahead of TurkVers in PCS (with TurkVers ahead in composition) so it was all base value and GOE that put TurkVers ahead and I don’t think that’s unfair at all. In fact, that’s more than “fair” in CarPon’s favor given the performances.
TL;DR: I don’t see how the American teams were judges harshly at all. Every score seemed very fair given the performances of the day.
I am not convinced that C/P won't win at least bronze at Nats. Their programs are great and I hope they are able to work hard and get them polished. Judges are giving them some pretty good GOE. Browns don't need to be anywhere close to the podium. In the pbp thread for Espoo it was suggested they get other partners, I agree. She looks like she would do better with a taller partner.
So basically we have CarPon, GrePar, P/B, and the Browns and who else? In the mix after C/B and H/B. I feel like I am missing more but I can't think right now.
Ok I checked...Bratti/Som and McN/Spir might be in the mix for bronze though I doubt it. We also have Ces/Yeh, Ling/Wein, but neither seem there yet for me. The question is how will the two young teams of Zing/Kol and Kon/Sche figure in? They are both pretty stellar with awesome potential.
We still have two more competitions to go in the fall season (GPF for ChoBat & HawBak, Golden Spin for CarPon, PateBye & ZingKol), but it seems pretty clear that there is a two-way competition for bronze & pewter, and then a fight between 5 to 7 teams for 5th through 10th place at Nats, with maybe 2 other teams to add to the conversation for 10th through 13th place.Flores/Desyatov are also very much a part of the conversation.
That's sort of how I see it too with regard to 4CCs. I don't see the USFS willingly giving up a guaranteed medal (C/B) and a possible medal (H/B - if they're trying to make up ground on FBSoer before Worlds) just to get the other teams WS points, but I could see them doing that for #3 & 4 since I think they've clearly separated themselves from the rest of the pack this fall - they're probably looking at 6th place at best since I don't see either GreenP or CarPon beating LajLag at 4CCs, and the points you get for 6th at 4CCs (496) fall right between the points you get for 9th & 10th (517 & 465) at Worlds, which is probably where whomever is US3 in Saitama will end up.I could see USFS splitting the Worlds and 4CC assignments between #3 and #4 if the results are close, but with 4CC in the U.S., there's no way C/B and H/D aren't going, unless they decline, which I can't imagine they would unless there's an injury. And C/B in particular need that time in front of judges.
big question...I thought H/B had fantastic skating skills but they rec'd 8.86 compared to 9.39 G/P. Has Piper improved her skating skills drastically over the last few yrs. because it was said they were bad a lot a few yrs. ago..Paul always had great skating skills. l am asking for expert opinion as unless it is exactly pointed out to me where and when something happened & why it is bad I am lost....I never figure skated?Have to say I felt both C/P and H/B got judged very very harshly compared to others at Espoo. That bronze should have been C/P's who have a much better FD with way more nuance, sophistication, and complexity than T/V who got some of the biggest home ice boost I've ever seen. And H/B finishing no less than 17 points behind G/P is also completely unfair imo.
4CCs has never been a second tier competition for dance or pairs, really, for the entirety of its lifetime. Both the US and CAN have almost always sent their top teams in dance and pairs, with the only exception to that rule being Olympic seasons, usually due to the travel and short turnaround time on the calendar.I appreciate 4CC moving away from being a second tier competition, especially in dance. However, I wish there was a second tier post-nationals international as there are so many skaters around the world who deserve to compete after December/January but whose feds don't have enough spots for them to do so at euros/worlds/4CC. (Whether it's only one dance spot for Finland or only 3 dance spots for the US.) I feel like it would be good for skating if more skaters could keep their seasons going, although I know that would cost money as well.
4CCs has never been a second tier competition for dance or pairs, really, for the entirety of its lifetime. Both the US and CAN have almost always sent their top teams in dance and pairs, with the only exception to that rule being Olympic seasons, usually due to the travel and short turnaround time on the calendar.
H/B missed some levels on their step sequences....some turns were either flat or did not maintain a consistent edge...so that does reflect in the skating skills mark. They seemed a bit tentative at times whereas G/P were very confident and had good speed and flow. I think G/P's scores were a bit high....IMO, their skating skills are on the same level as G/F and C/B but don't particularly stand out...but they were the class of the field here and the judges scored them as such.big question...I thought H/B had fantastic skating skills but they rec'd 8.86 compared to 9.39 G/P. Has Piper improved her skating skills drastically over the last few yrs. because it was said they were bad a lot a few yrs. ago..Paul always had great skating skills. l am asking for expert opinion as unless it is exactly pointed out to me where and when something happened & why it is bad I am lost....I never figure skated?
Thank-you. So Kaitlyn was a bit off but G/P was overmarked as well.H/B missed some levels on their step sequences....some turns were either flat or did not maintain a consistent edge...so that does reflect in the skating skills mark. They seemed a bit tentative at times whereas G/P were very confident and had good speed and flow. I think G/P's scores were a bit high....IMO, their skating skills are on the same level as G/F and C/B but don't particularly stand out...but they were the class of the field here and the judges scored them as such.
Pipers are still not good. Not sure what the judges saw.big question...I thought H/B had fantastic skating skills but they rec'd 8.86 compared to 9.39 G/P. Has Piper improved her skating skills drastically over the last few yrs. because it was said they were bad a lot a few yrs. ago..Paul always had great skating skills. l am asking for expert opinion as unless it is exactly pointed out to me where and when something happened & why it is bad I am lost....I never figure skated?
Hi, troll... Still scared, huh?Hayawek and Baker are such a bore US ice dance is in big trouble if they are the next leaders following C&B retirement.
I would not be in favor of USFS splitting 4CCs/Worlds between U.S. #3/#4. 4CCs is going to be a very important event this season in dance, with 3 potential World medalists presumably competing at 4CCs and many other strong teams as well. USFS should 100% send the A team IMO. And I believe they will do that.