screech
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,454
When I was in my teens I was nowhere near elite level, but my coach made me switch my painkiller medication from Tylenol to Advil (or the other way around, I can't remember) because one of them occasionally came up on the banned substance list. This was just in the off chance that I ever reached a level where I'd be tested.
When I competed at sectionals (in Canada) in the 90s and qualified for what was then Divisionals, I remember the completely in-depth forms that had to be filled out listing the entire medical history. I remember being 16 and completely overwhelmed having to fill in any medications (and not understanding whether I had to put things like occasionally taking Advil/Tylenol when I had a headache, since I didn't take anything regularly), having to fill in when my last menstruation was (as a 16 year old with spotty, irregular periods, I had no idea how to include 'well, I had it 6 months ago, but before that it was 2 weeks...')... I can only imagine how in depth these things are now, 25 years later. All I can say is at that level, you definitely know what you're getting into.
One worry this ruling brings up in me is that the rules seem to only be applied to athletes aged 16+. Even if everyone where to absolutely follow these anti-doping rules, those who do take things to assist in training or performance will still absolutely do so at the junior level. As much as it is now clear that the age for competing at the senior level should be raised to 16, it doesn't help issues at the lower levels where it's guaranteed those who've been given things will continue to get away with taking the medications.
When I competed at sectionals (in Canada) in the 90s and qualified for what was then Divisionals, I remember the completely in-depth forms that had to be filled out listing the entire medical history. I remember being 16 and completely overwhelmed having to fill in any medications (and not understanding whether I had to put things like occasionally taking Advil/Tylenol when I had a headache, since I didn't take anything regularly), having to fill in when my last menstruation was (as a 16 year old with spotty, irregular periods, I had no idea how to include 'well, I had it 6 months ago, but before that it was 2 weeks...')... I can only imagine how in depth these things are now, 25 years later. All I can say is at that level, you definitely know what you're getting into.
One worry this ruling brings up in me is that the rules seem to only be applied to athletes aged 16+. Even if everyone where to absolutely follow these anti-doping rules, those who do take things to assist in training or performance will still absolutely do so at the junior level. As much as it is now clear that the age for competing at the senior level should be raised to 16, it doesn't help issues at the lower levels where it's guaranteed those who've been given things will continue to get away with taking the medications.