Apparently, some of the feds are telling Jackie Wong privately that the extra spots for China and Japan are being considered part of the 16 awarded at Worlds, even though that's NOT what it says in the qualifying document.In addition, there are 16 spots to be earned at Worlds so if my math is correct Hungary & the Czech Republic have also earned an Olympic berth.
Yes, but it's Jackie Wong so I'm ignoring it for the time being - I think @tony, and others have this figured out & I'll go with that interpretation because it makes the most sense until we get confirmation from the ISU.Apparently, some of the feds are telling Jackie Wong privately that the extra spots for China and Japan are being considered part of the 16 awarded at Worlds, even though that's NOT what it says in the qualifying document.
The timeline in the document also states that the ISU will publish no less than 3 weeks after Worlds the initial list of qualified countries for all disciplines, so it's possible that Japan just straight away says "we don't have a 2nd pairs team, we're giving it back" rather than try to hold onto it until at least Nebelhorn.
• NOCs which have earned the necessary points for two (2) or three (3) entries but did not have two (2) or respectively three (3) Skaters qualified for the Free Skating/Free Dance at the ISU World Figure Skating Championships 2021. This quota place will be in addition to the quota place(s) that the NOC had earned in D.1. These ISU members are entitled to enter one (1) Skater in the qualifying event who had not qualified for the Free Skating/Free Dance at the ISU World Figure Skating Championships 2021.
These feds should have lawyers drafting letters right now.The problem and the reason Czech Republic and Hungary should be all over the ISU right now is the wording that says the federations have the right to 2 or 3 spots ONLY IF, IN ADDITION, all of said skaters were in the long program or free dance.
Exactly. I don't think there is any way that a federation can, reasonably, interpret the document to mean that they get the 2nd or 3rd spot awarded on some "conditional" basis as long as whomever they send to Nebelhorn places in the top 3.The problem and the reason Czech Republic and Hungary should be all over the ISU right now is the wording that says the federations have the right to 2 or 3 spots ONLY IF, IN ADDITION, all of said skaters were in the long program or free dance.
Now I don't care what kind of way anyone decides to interpret this after the fact. If you don't have skaters actually in the long programs, they are not entitled to holding those initial allotment spots, you are not in section D1 at all, don't collect $200, do not pass go.
But do go to D2, where those 3 extra allotted spots via Nebelhorn are addressed:
And you better believe I kept writing to them about it!We always need to keep in mind that this is the same ISU that gave the Chinese an extra spot at the Junior Worlds they hadn't earned, and ended up with 22 pairs in 2018 when it was supposed to be 20, so really anything can happen.
I'm not surprised that you're that kind of 'Can I talk to the Federation?' type.And you better believe I kept writing to them about it!
22 pairs in 2018 Olympics was known: The North Korean team was granted a wildcard as they didn't qualify via Nebelhorn and South Korea wanted to do something nice (this wasn't only for figure skating IIRC), and the South Korean team got in via the known wildcard spot, IIRC. I believe that is always a thing, and maybe quite possibly why the number of 'official' entries dropped to 19.We always need to keep in mind that this is the same ISU that gave the Chinese an extra spot at the Junior Worlds they hadn't earned, and ended up with 22 pairs in 2018 when it was supposed to be 20, so really anything can happen.
Oh yes, I know why it was done in 2018 - my point was that they are the ISU's rules & therefore they can find ways around them.22 pairs in 2018 Olympics was known: The North Korean team was granted a wildcard as they didn't qualify via Nebelhorn and South Korea wanted to do something nice (this wasn't only for figure skating IIRC), and the South Korean team got in via the known wildcard spot, IIRC. I believe that is always a thing, and maybe quite possibly why the number of 'official' entries dropped to 19.
The ISU used to have a rule at Worlds that a skater from the host nation would always make it to the long program, even if they were dead last in qualifying and the short program. I think that is along the same lines regarding the IOC.
22 pairs in 2018 Olympics was known: The North Korean team was granted a wildcard as they didn't qualify via Nebelhorn and South Korea wanted to do something nice (this wasn't only for figure skating IIRC), and the South Korean team got in via the known wildcard spot, IIRC. I believe that is always a thing, and maybe quite possibly why the number of 'official' entries dropped to 19.
The ISU used to have a rule at Worlds that a skater from the host nation would always make it to the long program, even if they were dead last in qualifying and the short program. I think that is along the same lines regarding the IOC.
Correct! For some reason, I thought PRK didn't even try at Nebelhorn for whatever reason.The North Korean team did qualify at Nebelhorn: http://www.isuresults.com/results/season1718/csger2017/CAT003RS.HTM
As I recall they gave up their spot initially and it went to the next team, then they got invited again by South Korea as a nice gesture as you said.
Yes, that's the case.So at Nebelhorn there will be 3 spots to earn for pairs plus the 2 of China and Japan. I guess China will have another pair ready then to grab that spot. Japan not, so it's four spots for anyone who did not get one at worlds and one that China still has to earn. Did I get it right?
That's up for debate. The way most of us here are interpreting the new qualification process, China & Japan's "additional" spots would be part of the 3 that are up for grabs at Nebelhorn. But apparently some of the feds have told Jackie Wong that isn't the case.So at Nebelhorn there will be 3 spots to earn for pairs plus the 2 of China and Japan. I guess China will have another pair ready then to grab that spot. Japan not, so it's four spots for anyone who did not get one at worlds and one that China still has to earn. Did I get it right?
I think he has bad information this time because that is clearly not what is written in the rules which the ISU agreed with the IOC.He’s saying he has confirmation from federations. I really don’t think so, it’s not what is written.
There is still a host country spot in each discipline if the host country doesn't qualify either via Worlds or Nebelhorn.22 pairs in 2018 Olympics was known: The North Korean team was granted a wildcard as they didn't qualify via Nebelhorn and South Korea wanted to do something nice (this wasn't only for figure skating IIRC), and the South Korean team got in via the known wildcard spot, IIRC. I believe that is always a thing, and maybe quite possibly why the number of 'official' entries dropped to 19.
The ISU used to have a rule at Worlds that a skater from the host nation would always make it to the long program, even if they were dead last in qualifying and the short program. I think that is along the same lines regarding the IOC.
I thought the ISU never published that China was allotted three spots, only that China sent three, and they accepted the applications without checking. Is this wrong?We always need to keep in mind that this is the same ISU that gave the Chinese an extra spot at the Junior Worlds they hadn't earned,
The North Koreans did not give up their spot. They never answered any communications about whether they were sending a team and never filed the required paperwork until the last minute. The ISU gave the spot to another team because it was believed PRK was not sending one.The North Korean team did qualify at Nebelhorn: http://www.isuresults.com/results/season1718/csger2017/CAT003RS.HTM
As I recall they gave up their spot initially and it went to the next team, then they got invited again by South Korea as a nice gesture as you said.
Was the last minute past the deadline for actively accepting, which is a requirement to keep a spot? If you don't respond/file paperwork by the deadline, that is giving up a spot. It would have been an exception to let them compete, which I'm glad they did.The North Koreans did not give up their spot. They never answered any communications about whether they were sending a team and never filed the required paperwork until the last minute. The ISU gave the spot to another team because it was believed PRK was not sending one.
The IOC allocates a certain number of athlete credentials to each sport and then each sport decides how to allocate them. There are five “additional athlete quota” spots that would go first to the host country if they didn’t qualify an entry in that discipline and then to “incomplete teams” in the team competition (athletes who will only get to compete in the team competition for teams who didn’t qualify an entry into one of the four disciplines). The pair event quota is 19 teams and the dance event quota is 23 teams. The “missing” pair and dance entries that you’d expect to fully fill five practice/warmup groups - those credentials went to the “additional athlete quota,” which is basically to fill up the incomplete team competition teams. (Every event is five practice/warm up groups: 6 Max per session for Singles (30 entries total); 4 for Pairs (should be 20 total); 5 for Dance (should be 25 total).)Also what's with '19' couples? Are we having 19 at the Olympics and not 20? If that's so the host nation can have a spot, surely with it being in China, there is no need for this rule this time around.
Occasionally I wonder if the ISU has changed their mind since 1918.But I wonder if ISU changed their minds since 2018.
Per the 2022 document, NOCs have 24hrs to respond upon notification of receiving a spot in any discipline and no response = declining the spot. I am fairly certain that has been the case for several Olympic cycles now so the PRK NOC didn't affirm to the IOC/ISU that they would, indeed, use their allocated pairs spot in time and the IOC/ISU gave it to the next country in line. I wonder if it had something to do with the fact that PRK wasn't sure they would send any delegation at all to the OWG in 2018 due to their relations with South Korea, so they just didn't respond when they got the notification.Was the last minute past the deadline for actively accepting, which is a requirement to keep a spot? If you don't respond/file paperwork by the deadline, that is giving up a spot. It would have been an exception to let them compete, which I'm glad they did.