wickedwitch
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 15,994
From May:
5 out of 12, assuming Feng/Nyman and Lockley/Prochnow both earn a second spot. Being generous to the USFSA, and assuming that if Hom/Jerosch were available, they'd have two, that makes 7 out of 12 total. For the US's weakest disipline, I can't imagine any way this is a good thing.
Potential causes:
1) not enough age eligible skaters who want to do pairs
2) not enough age eligible teams
3) USFSA's standards are too high
Reason 1 has been discussed a lot, so I won't go into that here. I think the USFSA could do more to encourage age eligible pairs (like envelope funding that's only available to teams who are age eligible), but it's a tricky balance between that and not discouraging pairs period.
3 is an easily solvable issue. Obviously the USFSA could just lower the score needed, and it's very possible they should. But another option could be to set scores separately for the SP and the LP. A team would only have to get one of the scores to get an assignment. (I believe now it's a total score needed, but since the USFSA doesn't publish anything about this I could easily be wrong.) That way new teams that are still gelling might be able to qualify earlier in the season by focusing on one program without really lowering the standard.
@Sylvia so out of the top ten in Jr at Nationals, only 2nd (Feng/Nyman) and 3rd (Lockley/Prochnow) are left to do juniors this season? Wow.
So I guess apart from the 3 on the ISP, we might expect to see a couple novice teams and some of the new teams on the JGP.
I wonder if the US will end up using all the JGP spots.
Spoiler alert: they won't. They only used 7 of 8 this past season, so there's no way they'll use all 12.
I wouldn't count on that. There is a concerted effort to invest in pairs in the US, and I think that all spots will be used this season.
5 out of 12, assuming Feng/Nyman and Lockley/Prochnow both earn a second spot. Being generous to the USFSA, and assuming that if Hom/Jerosch were available, they'd have two, that makes 7 out of 12 total. For the US's weakest disipline, I can't imagine any way this is a good thing.
Potential causes:
1) not enough age eligible skaters who want to do pairs
2) not enough age eligible teams
3) USFSA's standards are too high
Reason 1 has been discussed a lot, so I won't go into that here. I think the USFSA could do more to encourage age eligible pairs (like envelope funding that's only available to teams who are age eligible), but it's a tricky balance between that and not discouraging pairs period.
3 is an easily solvable issue. Obviously the USFSA could just lower the score needed, and it's very possible they should. But another option could be to set scores separately for the SP and the LP. A team would only have to get one of the scores to get an assignment. (I believe now it's a total score needed, but since the USFSA doesn't publish anything about this I could easily be wrong.) That way new teams that are still gelling might be able to qualify earlier in the season by focusing on one program without really lowering the standard.