gkelly
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 16,709
I think it's pretty meaningless to debate whether X is more artistic than Y . . . especially since we're probably all using different definitions/criteria for what constitutes artistry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As far as Hanyu being that special artistically, I do not think that's the case.
Well, that's not the first time you're wrong about something and I'm pretty sure it won't be the last.
You really can't stand it that he's the rock star of skating, can you? And that so many of the figure skating elite consider him the best skater ever?
.......... I'm a baby boomer too and lived through those skating years. The kids skating today are every bit as good or better than those of yesteryear.
The kids skating today are every bit as good or better than those of yesteryear.
It's all right, we'll be back to the regularly scheduled Max-bashing next week.
Just to clarify, I'm not making any argument about whether Jason is "artistic" or not, or trying to qualify that with "choreographed". I'm thinking about the technical aspects of designing a program for maximum impact & effectiveness, especially in an Olympic season where your most important performance of the year is going to be in front of a huge audience who largely are not American and are not obsessed skating fans.
Generally speaking, the skater's goal in this situation should be to bring the audience into the performance and then punctuate it with a big TA-DA!! ending. Judges also like to see programs that project joy and/or total confidence in skating -- again, a remark of Scott Hamilton's, describing her 2008 program as "my name is Shizuka and I am here to win". I also think of that masterpiece that Jeremy Abbott skated at 2010 Nationals.
When I saw "Riverdance" for the first time at the Broadmoor Open 4 years ago, I knew it was going to be a winner and thought it would likely put Jason on the Olympic team even though he was a really dark horse at that time. #1 was the incredible difficulty of the choreography and the quality of the spins, which I was sure no other US man would match at that time. #2 was that the program had a particularly effective structure: starting out with building tension and then exploding into a joyous ending where the audience could clap and stomp along with the music. And it was *memorable*, which I can't say about either of this year's programs.
About Jason's SP specifically, I think it is a safe bet that virtually none of the people in the arena in Pyeongchang will have seen "Hamilton" on Broadway, and maybe only a small number are familiar with the plot of the show or context of the particular song Jason is skating to. And a story about American patriots from the 18th century probably isn't going to resonate deeply with a broad international audience. (I remember another quote about ice dance from years back: if you need a press release to explain your program theme, it's probably a bad idea.) The music needs to stand on its own and have appeal simply as music, and this piece doesn't do that. Even if some folks watching on TV in the US love it, skaters say that it's really not helpful to the performance when the audience in the arena is totally indifferent.
I remember the whole "Jason is not an artist but just a dancer" thing back in the 2014-2015 season when people were all about Joshua Farris. I remember those two skaters were being compared and contrasted with some saying Josh was more of a "real" artist, while most Jason fans I remember argued both were artists and were just artists in different ways.
And/or the ever-popular Johnny-bashing by the usual suspects, eh!![]()
About Jason's SP specifically, I think it is a safe bet that virtually none of the people in the arena in Pyeongchang will have seen "Hamilton" on Broadway, and maybe only a small number are familiar with the plot of the show or context of the particular song Jason is skating to. And a story about American patriots from the 18th century probably isn't going to resonate deeply with a broad international audience.
mucho macho multiple quads
There's a clip floating around of Nathan's possible short program (choreographed by Shae) that he was practicing at Sun Valley today. It's on someone's personal IG - but it's public, so I'm assuming it's okay to post (let me know if it's not!!): [ETA: link to the original/first clip no longer works - it has since been re-uploaded to a new Instagram post]
"Nemesis" by Benjamin Clementine appears to be Nathan's SP music - 3 clips (a run through filmed at his Sun Valley practice) have been posted in the Programs/Choreographers thread: (ETA: link removed because all the Instagram posts have been taken down)
First, let me say I'm not sure if the Hamilton SP works because the sound quality of the vids I have seen has been less than illuminating, and the choreo in the first part leaves me confused. I do like the musical hook as I have heard it when I streamed it, and if "Wait for It" is an an all music piece, it may very well be better for Jason. I don't know. It's the last day of July, we will wait and see.
But I must say, as much as I love and adore my relatives, friends and co-workers in their 20s and 30s (who appear IME to be the most devoted fans of Hamilton), a deep and abiding interest in American history is not underlying their love for Hamilton. What they know about American history, they learned from Hamilton. They certainly didn't bring their knowledge *into* the show.
This is not a musical about American history. This is Lin-Manuel Miranda's latest musical. Saying you need American history to appreciate "Hamilton" is like saying you need to understand old Norse mythology to appreciate the Ride of the Valkyries, or have read Schiller to appreciate the last movement of Beethoven's Ninth.
Now will international audiences appreciate the *music* of Hamilton? That is the question....
I think Brown has choreographed artistry in his programs, that is not the same as having true artistry. E.g. his freeskate consists of series of beautiful looking poises, one after another..., but that is not musical interpretation either. And his skating looks real slow!
Saying you need American history to appreciate "Hamilton" is like saying you need to understand old Norse mythology to appreciate the Ride of the Valkyries, or have read Schiller to appreciate the last movement of Beethoven's Ninth.
Now will international audiences appreciate the *music* of Hamilton? That is the question....
I think it's pretty meaningless to debate whether X is more artistic than Y . . . especially since we're probably all using different definitions/criteria for what constitutes artistry.
I agree. I played "The Room Where it Happens" for my father, who isn't a hardcore fan, but has watched plenty of skating over the years and is very musical. His immediate reaction was that it could make a great program. I'm withholding judgement on whether it works for a SP or these are the right cuts however until I see a more finished version. As several people have said, Wait For It could work well. And Burn would be interesting (though more for Ladies or Dance).Hamilton is amazing music. Not sure if it works for a 2:40 program. I think the opening tracks may have worked best. I still don't get a lot of the choreography in the SP because I'm not sure if it actually goes with the music and lyrics, but I respect Jason for thinking outside the box with this one.
Wagner and Beethoven wrote music. Good music, in fact. But I'm not sure Jason's, er, soundtrack is actually "music", or just noises.![]()
Please be ironicAgree... but in Jason's case it's pretty clear, no?
Some people will never know what artistry is though, that's why it's easier for them to follow skating being a fan of the technical.That's where the "artistry is subjective" comes from in this case IMO. They just aren't creative people/fans and don't really get it, nor will they ever. Or they're really just gymnastics fans pretending to be skating fans. (
) Quads and technical points are easier to understand for them.
I agree. I played "The Room Where it Happens" for my father, who isn't a hardcore fan, but has watched plenty of skating over the years and is very musical. His immediate reaction was that it could make a great program. I'm withholding judgement on whether it works for a SP or these are the right cuts however until I see a more finished version. As several people have said, Wait For It could work well. And Burn would be interesting (though more for Ladies or Dance).
Or they just don't like Jason's style. Artistry is in the eye of the beholder. Skating skills can be admired...but artistry is pretty subjective.Agree... but in Jason's case it's pretty clear, no?
Some people will never know what artistry is though, that's why it's easier for them to follow skating being a fan of the technical.That's where the "artistry is subjective" comes from in this case IMO. They just aren't creative people/fans and don't really get it, nor will they ever. Or they're really just gymnastics fans pretending to be skating fans. (
) Quads and technical points are easier to understand for them.
The difference being that Weir is a bitter, petty asshat, and Max is a sweetheart.
Well, that's not the first time you're wrong about something and I'm pretty sure it won't be the last.
You really can't stand it that he's the rock star of skating, can you? And that so many of the figure skating elite consider him the best skater ever?
Gee, thanks, @aftershocks! I'm going to be hearing The Village People in the back of my mind for the rest of the day.
If I've gotta hear them, then at least let me not be alone in this!
Mucho macho quads
I gotta do some macho quads
Mucho macho quads
I gotta do some macho
Just like how Johnny Weir and his uberfans kept proclaiming he was the greatest skating artiste ever,