I don't understand what you are saying here, especially because I very much DID say we should have the debate after nationals in an earlier post.
Nowhere did I say Brown shouldn't be sent no matter what happens at nationals, and I very much DO point out what is in his favour a couple of times, and why it might be advantageous for the USFS to send him. It would be foolish to say no if he ends up with silver and a 90 point margin over bronze. I just disagree in any normal scenario it is "discrimination" if he isn't sent, because then I can equally apply "discrimination" to other skaters from multiple other points of view. Brown has his own reputation that they judges actually recognize, that others very much do lack - this consideration is in HIS favour, nobody else's currently. So let's not slip into saying he's somehow being "discriminated" against whenever someone so much as disagrees with team selection. All it means is someone disagrees. Using "ageism" there frankly devalues a loaded term.
?
