As I understand it, the reason for the denial is not that she is not talented enough or hasn't achieved enough, its that her achievements do not count because the USCIS don't consider ISU competitions to be internationally recognized because one has to represent a country with ISU membership in order to be eligible to compete.
Gobbledegook. Good for her for appealing.
Other thoughts:
-There have clearly been athletes that have gained citizenship since Tanith who did not have as high a level of international achievement as Belbin & Agosto. I am remembering an interview with a Nordic skier. He didn't need a partner with citizenship. He didn't medal. They didn't expect him to medal. Using B&A as a standard isn't fair.
-Also perhaps not comparable. When B&A applied, they had the argument that they could contribute in a more unique way than anyone else. At that time no U.S. dance team had medaled for over a decade and there was no other team that could accomplish such a high level of success.
-Athletes do know that obtaining U.S. citizenship is not easy. The wait time has always been longer than for many countries. I remember 5 years being the standard for non-expedited citizenship years ago. No idea if that is still the norm since we've had so many changes over the last several administrations.
-Expedited citizenship obviously requires a certain level of achievement first so it's not necessarily all that "expedited." If someone had specified that the level of achievement was the issue for Christina, then C&P could work for it. However, that doesn't appear to be the case. It's wise to apply early regardless.
-The Danes left their Federation because there was no route toward citizenship at all that would allow them to train with a top coaching team. That isn't the case in the U.S. There has always been a route toward citizenship. But it can be a difficult and long one. In many disciplines, the wait might be unthinkable. In dance, however, missing one Olympics and aiming for another is plausible. As most dance teams peak at a 2nd or 3rd Olympics. It's a huge commitment; but for the right partner, it could be worth it.
-We don't know how long USFSA could hold Anthony; but we do know the following:
C&P have a Junior World medal. (Actually two). No one I can think of that has been released from USFS has reached that level of accomplishment at the Junior level prior to a release. (Not Piper. Not Keegan). Can anyone think of an athlete that has done so?
If Daniel Eaton gains a release to skate for Korea, he will have done so.
In a conversation on another thread earlier this year, Kwanfan said back when Morgan Mathews was trying to gain a release, the requirement was that she wait five years. (Maybe this was not arbitrary and was linked to the 5 years for citizenship requirement at the time?) I think a lot of us have assumed that the amount of time USFS requires for a release may have dropped; but does anyone know? If Eaton competes this season, it will only have been 4 since he medaled at 4CCs. If Min & Eaton don't compete for Korea until next year, it will have been the full 5 years. (Though I think only 4 since he last competed--with a different partner--internationally for the U.S.)
Mathews & Zavoisin and Aldridge & Eaton both had a 4CC medal. So they had met a higher level of achievement than just a Junior World medal. It is possible they might have been/be held to a longer wait time than Anthony & Christina would be. (Even if the wait time hasn't been decreased).