jamesy
delightful
- Messages
- 13,862
Her entire storyline left in Kane's pocket.I keep forgetting Jamie's name - she got a lot of airtime at the beginning but barely any now.
Her entire storyline left in Kane's pocket.I keep forgetting Jamie's name - she got a lot of airtime at the beginning but barely any now.
If Carolyn goes out last before F3, I think she might still be mad enough to hold it against her former allies, but we've seen before that she does cool off and then return to her strong ties - which would make a case for having voted her out this week. Although yes, who knows what jury damage she could do in the meantime.I think one of the reasons that Yam Yam didn't vote for Carolyn is that he wouldn't want her, thinking he 'betrayed' her, as part of the jury. As much as I love Carolyn, I can just imagine how volatile she would be in that jury position with someone who 'betrayed' her in the final 3.
Rumor has it that this happens on the last show.I loved Jamie's positivity during her little exit interview, but I want to know how she reacted when she found out her idol was fake.
I laughed when Carson said his vote was up for grabs. As IF he would vote for anyone besides Yam Yam after that .However, I was quite touched with the way Yam Yam comforted and kept teaching and helping Carson with the firemaking.
It happened in the first four seasons alone!Has anyone who was picked by the immunity winner to go to the final ever win?
They showed Bruce in the clip for Survivor 45 saying "I'm back baby". Hopefully he'll last longer this time!I would have liked an update on Bruce
I believe the question is whether anyone has been the winner in the new generation where there’s no vote at 4 and a fire-making challenge. Several times since the start of that, the tactic has seemed to be win the final challenge, revoke it and go up in fire against the perceived biggest threat to win, and then get the resume after sending that person packing. We saw the two battle back seasons (38 and 40) where it quite nearly happened both times with players that didn’t even play the majority of the game. It did happen the first time, and in all-winners, several people commented to Natalie that she had to play the perfect game, which meant winning in fire. She chose to keep herself safe and put Tony versus Sarah, and even though she only played something like 5 or 6 days the entire game, previous winners were prepared to give her the votes.It happened in the first four seasons alone!
thanks Tony - my Q was for the new generation - where no voting involved.I believe the question is whether anyone has been the winner in the new generation where there’s no vote at 4 and a fire-making challenge. Several times since the start of that, the tactic has seemed to be win the final challenge, revoke it and go up in fire against the perceived biggest threat to win, and then get the resume after sending that person packing. We saw the two battle back seasons (38 and 40) where it quite nearly happened both times with players that didn’t even play the majority of the game. It did happen the first time, and in all-winners, several people commented to Natalie that she had to play the perfect game, which meant winning in fire. She chose to keep herself safe and put Tony versus Sarah, and even though she only played something like 5 or 6 days the entire game, previous winners were prepared to give her the votes.
But also remember that Erika was the person pulled automatically into the final by Xander, and his stating that he thought he could beat her was part of his big finale downfall. So yes, it’s happened.
We saw that though it took time for Carson to start his fire, it was doing really well by the time Heidi won. I'm curious how long it actually took for his fire to break the string - how would his time have measured up on any other season.
I really enjoyed it, too!Really enjoyed this season! Real players who know and love the game, who played hard and had fun doing it. I had to laugh when more than once they talked about how hard it is to concentrate in challenges with Jeff barking at them, and how he laughed about it too.
Yeah, I thought Heidi was going to win based on how they cheered her on during the fire making challenge, but she definitely blew it with the jury.I really thought Heidi had it in the bag the way that the jury seemed to be cheering her on during the fire and all the adulation from everyone, Jeff included, for how fast she did it. But then she blew it with the jury. Interrupted others, didn't answer the questions, instead talked too much about her life journey rather than her game and the others. Not surprised only Danny voted for her.
That is so nice of Carolyn! I have never liked her, not because she’s so emotional and over the top at times, but because of the disdainful way she spoke of other players during her early confessionals.In better Carolyn news, to the surprise of basically nobody, she won the Sia Award ($100,000 gifted by the singer). Sia also gave both Carson and Lauren $15,000 each.