I've said this several times- I don't care where the skater is from. I've been on the cases of American skaters, Japanese skaters, Russian skaters, and probably a little of everyone in between when it comes to the technical panels and the judges. I was writing articles way before the 'e' and '!' thing turned into two options with a reduction in start value for the e where I said it was ridiculous a skater could technically do four of the same jump in a program and earn nearly full points for each one.
Tony, i know you are not bias, and you've been pretty consistent in your stands. I've read your comments and explanations of various jump issues, in this and previous events. I agree with some, and not quite with few others, but lets leave it at this. There is always a room for discussion. There are more tough and less tough judging panels, but the "intensity and scrutiny" of each should apply to all skaters in a given event.
With the all the intensity of resentment and a huge wave of negativity towards "new generation of russian ladies" which comes in various forms and through various issues (from fans, other skaters, media, federation and officials), it is hard to sometimes distinguish which is a pure bias, what is a mistake, or what is just an opinion, in judging.
I was upset over "wrong entry on the jump" in Bradie Tennell's issue, but many agreed with me, so there was no discussion. That was a clear mistake, though, not intentional.
We both agree that the timing on Zagitova's and Andrews' routines are questionable, and we're not the only ones. Both programmes' timing should have been looked at through the same criteria.
Zagitova's 3-3 combo in SP, was UR and edge, and deserves max - 3, which most gave her. When -5 and -4 come from JPN and USA judges...... that looks interesting..

... while it is quite unusual for a JPN judges, it is pretty much expected from anyone from USA, given it is now days USA who "goes after everything Russian" and the majority of people who try to seek out some kind of "evil" in Russian skating are North Americans..
Quite a few people, including you (and me naturally) agree that Kostornaya's 3A in SP had a clean landing, with no flow on a landing, and yet she still managed to do a forward leap without hindrance of motion. The fact that it was called UR and in combination with other judging issues at that event, that were not clear, that the reason for Rus. Feds sent an inquiry letter to the ISU. When a clearly clean jump gets a UR, given all other issues taking place with "russian ladies" and ultra-difficult jumps, it deserves an explanation.
so...I'll wait until the answer comes before analyzing judging further.