marbri
Hey, Kool-Aid!
- Messages
- 17,168
A very long time which is why I posted what I posted.....How long have you been here.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A very long time which is why I posted what I posted.....How long have you been here.![]()
I'm curious how we know that it's a false positive, rather than the second test being a false negative.All I am pointing out is that they were improving 2 spots each time worlds was held so it's not unlikely they reasonably believed they had a shot at top 20 therefore having a reason to believe they got screwed by a false positive test. So yeah, I think they got screwed by a false positive. I won't lose any sleep over it but I have a lot of sympathy for them and the sleep they are losing over this.
But that's boring.Not everything on this board has to be a debate.
From what I heard, if these are the tests I think they are, false positive are relatively common, but false negatives are comparatively rare. (Assuming the YKW is detectable at that stage of infection, I assume. Which could be a complicating factor.)I'm curious how we know that it's a false positive, rather than the second test being a false negative.
I am assuming that based on the fact he tested negative in Canada before leaving as did his partner. His partner tested negative in Sweden, he didn't on the first test. But he tested negative on the second and third test he requested in Sweden so I am assuming they are correct in stating it was a false positive. According to this article I think he is saying that the first test had a threshold of 19.7 whereas for a real positive the threshold should be 23.8-33.2 which should have triggered an immediate retesting instead of 24 hours later. (fwiw I don't know the science here, so taking this at face value)I'm curious how we know that it's a false positive, rather than the second test being a false negative.
Anyway, of course they're more invested in this than we are, and it sucks to have your season end like this. But I just don't see how results from several years ago tell us much about how they'd have done here - and their more recent record suggests that they would have had to qualify a spot at Nebelhorn. Which they still can
But that's boring.
He would have tested negative on his first test in Sweden or else he wouldn’t have been allowed into the bubble. The positive came on a subsequent test is my understanding.I am assuming that based on the fact he tested negative in Canada before leaving as did his partner. His partner tested negative in Sweden, he didn't on the first test.
How would they be able to test "positive" if they were already there? Is it not a true bubble? Sad, but griping about it won't solve anything.He would have tested negative on his first test in Sweden or else he wouldn’t have been allowed into the bubble. The positive came on a subsequent test is my understanding.
That's the whole point. As far as anyone can tell, it was a false positive.How would they be able to test "positive" if they were already there? Is it not a true bubble? Sad, but griping about it won't solve anything.
I feel for them too, and can't imagine how disappointing this must have been.I just feel for them. Regardless of your standing in the ranks all these skaters put in the same blood, sweat and tears to make their dreams come true and it has to be a real bitter pill to swallow to have it taken away like that![]()
Scenario 1: it’s a false positive (in which case horrible timing)How would they be able to test "positive" if they were already there? Is it not a true bubble? Sad, but griping about it won't solve anything.
If I read this aright, the re-test results did not arrive before the SD anyway.Friday March 26, 2021: Simon and Tina are scheduled to compete at 1:00pm CEST. At 6:30am CEST Simon is told by competition officials that he has tested POSITIVE for COVID. Tina receives a NEGATIVE test result. Simon requests an immediate re-test, and is told by officials that they will push for the results to be returned before they are scheduled to compete. It is announced that Tina and Simon have withdrawn from competition due to health reasons. Tina and Simon did not withdraw from competition. Results do not arrive until 8:30pm CEST. Simon is told the results are POSITIVE. Medical documentation does not support this, and shows the test result was actually NEGATIVE.
This is the sticking point for me, too - the health protocol was clearly positive test = you're out. For them to have expected to be allowed to compete following a positive test is either ignorant or callously indifferent to the health of others. Even if there had been a negative test result in time, that's two contradictory results at an event that was already dealing with considerable risk. People were trying their best to make it work, and that meant following protocols.If I read this aright, the re-test results did not arrive before the SD anyway.
So basically, the Armenians are saying the ISU should have let them compete with a positive test result, when they did not know if it was a false positive or a real positive. The Armenians are saying that the ISU should have disregarded the health risks and let them compete with a positive test. That the ISU had to forcibly withdraw the Armenians because they would not have voluntarily withdrawn with a positive test.
Yes, it sucks that the re-test did not arrive in time, but this timeline does nothing to increase my sympathy for this team - if anything, it diminishes it and makes them look even worse.
My god that is disgustingly dismissive. They have every right to ask for an investigation. And every skating fan should want one as well because I can just imagine the 180 people like you will be making next season if this situation happens to a skater you give a shit about....A press release was posted in the thread on GS which includes the below timeline:
If I read this aright, the re-test results did not arrive before the SD anyway.
So basically, the Armenians are saying the ISU should have let them compete with a positive test result, when they did not know if it was a false positive or a real positive. The Armenians are saying that the ISU should have disregarded the health risks and let them compete with a positive test. That the ISU had to forcibly withdraw the Armenians because they would not have voluntarily withdrawn with a positive test.
Yes, it sucks that the re-test did not arrive in time, but this timeline does nothing to increase my sympathy for this team - if anything, it diminishes it and makes them look even worse.
You have an opportunity to get a spot at Nebelhorn if you're good enough, Armenians. Off you go.
Now I understand what happened. It's unfortunate, but the chance is too risky if they were actually positive.My god that is disgustingly dismissive. They have every right to ask for an investigation. And every skating fan should want one as well because I can just imagine the 180 people like you will be making next season if this situation happens to a skater you give a shit about....
It doesn’t look good - I can’t imagine how it feels to be told you got two positive tests and then you’re thinking you have covid and wondering who you may have given it to, to finding out that’s not true. “Best” case scenario is that it was an honest mistake with no ill intent. Still begs the question of how this happened and should trigger a review of protocols.I read it as investigate why it took so long to get/reveal the results and why he was given the wrong results of the second test. Do they think the ISU had the real results early enough to let them skate, but didn't want to risk letting them skate, even if the number of false negatives is far lower than the number of false positives?
Probably not likely unless they were literally sitting in a lab. Collect sample, process and set up the run, and then qPCR runs take a few hours. Then you have to analyze the data.Can a PCR test be turned around in less than 6 hours? I know the antigen test takes about 15 minutes, but is not as accurate.
Occam's razor - the best case scenario is by far the most plausible. The alternative is someone setting out to deliberately sabotage the Armenians, and honestly how exactly does one arrange for a false positive CV test in a foreign country, and why would anyone even bother?It doesn’t look good - I can’t imagine how it feels to be told you got two positive tests and then you’re thinking you have ********* and wondering who you may have given it to, to finding out that’s not true. “Best” case scenario is that it was an honest mistake with no ill intent. Still begs the question of how this happened and should trigger a review of protocols.
Agreed, and they're not even a major contender for the title too. There can only be one Tonya Harding!Occam's razor - the best case scenario is by far the most plausible. The alternative is someone setting out to deliberately sabotage the Armenians, and honestly how exactly does one arrange for a false positive CV test in a foreign country, and why would anyone even bother?