sk9tingfan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,852

U.S. Figure Skating Announces 2022-23 Qualifying Season | U.S. Figure Skating

Well, it seems that between Norwood and Lake Placid, my little car will be taking me to both sites frequently this year!

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2023 SINGLES, PAIRS AND ICE DANCE QUALIFYING SEASON ATHLETE BYE & ADVANCEMENT CRITERIA (5 pages): https://www.usfigureskating.org/sit...iles/2023QualifyingByeAdvancementCriteria.pdfHas USFS indicated how qualifying is working this year for Nationals on the senior level? I have completely lost the plot and trying to find info is very challenging.
2023 U.S. Figure Skating Qualifying Season | |||
---|---|---|---|
Event | Host City | Date | Host Club |
2023 Eastern Sectional Singles & U.S. Ice Dance Final | Norwood, Massachusetts | Nov. 8-12, 2022 | The Skating Club of Boston |
2023 Midwestern Sectional Singles & U.S. Pairs Final | Lansing, Michigan | Nov. 8-11, 2022 | Lansing SC |
2023 Pacific Coast Sectional Singles Final | San Francisco | Nov. 8-13, 2022 | The Skating Club of San Francisco |
2023 Toyota U.S. Figure Skating Championships & National Development Camp | San Jose, California | Jan. 23-29, 2023 | SAP Center & Sharks Ice at San Jose |
Did USFS ever provide a reason for not going back to the traditional path of Sectionals to Regionals to Nationals after COVID? Is it to expand outreach/cast a wider net by holding more stage-1 events in more locations, over a wider period of time? Is there a financial incentive to holding the NQSs rather than just three Sectionals per Region (3x3=total 9)? Lastly-Is there any plan to go back to the old pattern of Sectionals to Regionals to Nationals?
The old system was so clear and easy to understand…but maybe was unfair in there being an imbalance of talent and coaching between geographic sections/regions.
From the bottom of page 1 to the top of page 2 - one of the criteria for a bye to 2022 Nationals:Bumping up this thread to reply to @haribobo's question in another thread (so I don't have to post this link in many different threads in GSD):
2023 SINGLES, PAIRS AND ICE DANCE QUALIFYING SEASON ATHLETE BYE & ADVANCEMENT CRITERIA (5 pages): https://www.usfigureskating.org/sit...iles/2023QualifyingByeAdvancementCriteria.pdf
@Karen-W I moved this over here, but I don’t think Golden Spin was one of the competitions listed in that byes document the USFS released. Of course, they could switch things up, but that’s what I read, which I thought was odd because I thought previously Golden Spin had counted? Who knowsJapan Open is just the FS and doesn't get her a bye. Weird - the USFS Int'l Assignments page doesn't list Warsaw Trophy as an event for our skaters. Ice Challenge Austria is the same week as MKJW, so Bradie won't be assigned to that. Of course, she could be assigned to Golden Spin if she doesn't qualify for the GPF and earn a bye that way, lol.
I just looked and you're right. Neither is IceChallenge. So, it looks like the USFS is only allowing the September & October Challengers to count for international assignment byes.@Karen-W I moved this over here, but I don’t think Golden Spin was one of the competitions listed in that byes document the USFS released. Of course, they could switch things up, but that’s what I read, which I thought was odd because I thought previously Golden Spin had counted? Who knows?
I thought Ice Challenge was listed at the end of the document? Either way, Sectionals is going to be brutal and a lot of really good skaters are going to be left home!I just looked and you're right. Neither is IceChallenge. So, it looks like the USFS is only allowing the September & October Challengers to count for international assignment byes.
Women - 6 spots available through Sectionals (maximum 12 byes total)ADVANCEMENT TO THE U.S. FIGURE SKATING CHAMPIONSHIPS© SENIOR SINGLES
Maximum of 18 available spots at the U.S. Figure Skating Championships©
- Athletes who placed in the top five in the same event at the 2022 Toyota U.S. Figure Skating Championships per rule 2501 (B) (2)
- Athletes selected to the 2022 U.S. Figure Skating World Team (not including alternates) in the same event per rule 2501 (B) (2);
- Athletes who have won a medal in the singles event at the most recent Olympic Winter Games per rule 2501 (B) (2)
- Athletes who qualify for the same event at the ISU Grand Prix of Figure Skating Final or the ISU Junior Grand Prix of Figure Skating Final per rule 2501 (B) (2)
- Athletes who are assigned to and compete at three (3) international assignments classified as an ISU Grand Prix, ISU Junior Grand Prix and or ISU Challenger Series event • Refer to the approved list of international competitions within this document
- The top two total combined scores from each section in the Sectional Singles Final • Plus, next-best scores nationwide until maximum is met
I thought Ice Challenge was listed at the end of the document? Either way, Sectionals is going to be brutal and a lot of really good skaters are going to be left home!
Worse - 1) Autumn Classic wasn't held this season, 2) Asian Open was moved to December and isn't even a Challenger, 3) the USFS isn't sending skaters to Warsaw Cup, which is a Challenger and in Europe, 4) Golden Spin is also a Challenger and isn't included. Were they even paying attention to the ISU Calendar of Events in any way when they made this list and published it?Here's the document for reference: https://www.usfigureskating.org/sit...iles/2023QualifyingByeAdvancementCriteria.pdf
FWIW three of the events listed as covered under byes (Autumn Classic, Asian Open, and Denis Ten Memorial) are not listed on the USFS international assignments page.
I’m pretty sure they just randomly added some competitions to the documentWorse - 1) Autumn Classic wasn't held this season, 2) Asian Open was moved to December and isn't even a Challenger, 3) the USFS isn't sending skaters to Warsaw Cup, which is a Challenger and in Europe, 4) Golden Spin is also a Challenger and isn't included. Were they even paying attention to the ISU Calendar of Events in any way when they made this list and published it?
As @Debbie S Reminded me yesterday, there has always been a “within a week rule” for Internationals and Sectionals. However, that’s not listed anywhere in the bye document and plenty of rules that don’t apply to any skaters this season are listed. Hopefully it’s just an oversight on USFS part.Shouldn't Bradie get a bye due the conflict between Midwestern Sectionals (Nov 8-11) and NKJWT (Nov 11-13)? The possibility of conflicts isn't mentioned in the document but I don't see it as feasible for a skater to do Ice Challenge or NKJWT and sectionals since the dates overlap.
Yeah, the doc seems haphazard. Given that it's USFS, not shocking. I assume Bradie will be given a bye to Nats w/o having to compete at Sectionals, possibly via an assignment to Budapest Trophy. Those should be out by next Tuesday, so we'll know soon.As @Debbie S Reminded me yesterday, there has always been a “within a week rule” for Internationals and Sectionals. However, that’s not listed anywhere in the bye document and plenty of rules that don’t apply to any skaters this season are listed. Hopefully it’s just an oversight on USFS part.
Very true, I am bummed about the 18 skater max. It just really makes it almost impossible to make Nationals unless you are an International level skater. I think many mid level skaters stay in the sport to possibly make Nationals while knowing they will never get an International. Now there is little incentive for that either. In a sport that struggles With losing popularity it would seem that allowing a few more skaters to make Nationals would be great. Also, are they allowing alternates this year? I know they didn’t last year but I think that was mostly due to Covid restrictions.Yeah, the doc seems haphazard. Given that it's USFS, not shocking. I assume Bradie will be given a bye to Nats w/o having to compete at Sectionals, possibly via an assignment to Budapest Trophy. Those should be out by next Tuesday, so we'll know soon.
And USFS has also been flexible with byes in the past, when they felt it made sense even if not precisely within the rules, although that was before they limited the Nats field to 18.
Oh, good catch! It does seem like he's probably skating senior. I'll add him as a possible "bye" due to the conflict of two competitions that week.Thanks, great list! Also I believe Will Annis if he is skating senior at Nationals would have a bye because of Ice Challenge being Nov 9-13, same week at Sectionals. Also, Bradie and C/P are competing that week so that alone should give them a bye to Nationals- they shouldn't also need Golden Spin. If they can't compete at Sectionals because of the timing interfering with a GP event, it would be insane and grossly unfair to keep them out of Nationals for not doing a 3rd international event.
I wonder if this is why we haven’t heard anything “official” about Sectionals and Nationals. USFS realized they are going to have to break a lot of their rules from the document. They’ve been doing this for a long time, you would think it would be a little better thought out before releasing the document?Oh, good catch! It does seem like he's probably skating senior. I'll add him as a possible "bye" due to the conflict of two competitions that week.
The USFS really dropped the ball with this document, because it doesn't account for skaters/teams who, for whatever reason, wind up only competing in 2 GPs, one of which is the same week as Sectionals. They really screwed up with the list of Challengers that give teams a qualifying international, and they also really dropped the ball for the pairs teams since only 3 of the Challengers that do qualify for a bye had a pairs competition - if you didn't have a GP or get one, you're in trouble. It would have made a lot more sense to include Golden Spin on the qualifying list from the get-go, especially since Nationals isn't until the last week of January anyways.
Skaters know they're going to Sectionals already. I've seen "congrats on qualifying for Sectionals and/or Pairs/Dance Finals" posts from several clubs/coaches on IG this weekend - Dallas FSC and St Moritz FSC both hosted Sectionals send-offs yesterday.I wonder if this is why we haven’t heard anything “official” about Sectionals and Nationals. USFS realized they are going to have to break a lot of their rules from the document. They’ve been doing this for a long time, you would think it would be a little better thought out before releasing the document?
They haven't been doing NQS to sectionals for a long time. This year's rules for qualifying for sectionals are brand new this year.They’ve been doing this for a long time, you would think it would be a little better thought out before releasing the document?
You’re probably right. I think leaving skaters home bc they don’t fit the criteria but have International conflicts or have multiple international assignments would not be a good look!Skaters know they're going to Sectionals already. I've seen "congrats on qualifying for Sectionals and/or Pairs/Dance Finals" posts from several clubs/coaches on IG this weekend - Dallas FSC and St Moritz FSC both hosted Sectionals send-offs yesterday.
But, you know there are problems with the document when there are skaters/teams in all four disciplines that don't qualify for a bye per their own document, all of whom have at least 2 int'l assignments and only one of whom doesn't have a conflict with an int'l competition the same week as Sectionals.
My gut says, since they won't break their "maximum byes" allowed in any discipline by giving byes to those skaters, they will do so and call it good.
Yes, but they’ve been sending people to Internationals in the fall for a long time. It doesn’t take much to look at schedules and see that there are Challengers and a GP that overlap Sectionals. Put it in your document that if you are assigned to one and there’s a conflict (and you actually compete) you get a bye. I also would be interested to see what would happen if say someone had to pull out bc they caught Covid. The document says you have to compete, but what if you travel overseas, get sick, can’t compete and now you’ve missed Sectionals too?They haven't been doing NQS to sectionals for a long time. This year's rules for qualifying for sectionals are brand new this year.
It's only the second or third year for the reduced size Nationals, so it stands to reason that the bye rules from 3 or 4 years ago and earlier would not apply.
Actually, Lockley/Caputo missed the Pairs SP minimum today - they earned 19.24 - skated through their lift element. They're also missing the FS TES, but if there is some sort of injury that is preventing them from doing any lifts, I can't imagine they'll hit the FS TES in a couple days. Unless the USFS lowers the TES minimum, there will only be 11 teams at Nationals. The rest of the pairs teams have the TES mins (Fitzpatrick/Bearinger needed the SP and earned it today).Senior Pairs (8): Baram/Tioumentsev, Chan/Howe, Kam/O'Shea (making their debut together in Graz this week), Knierim/Frazier, McBeath/Bartholomay, Mokhova/Mokhov, Plazas/Fernandez, Smirnova/Siianytsia + all 4 teams competing in this week's U.S. Pairs Final = 12.
Athletes/teams must earn the minimum TES in both the short program/rhythm dance and the free skate/free dance, but do not need to earn them at the same competition.
For the 2022-23 season, the minimum TES are:
• Pairs Short Program: 22.0 / Free Skate: 40.0