That's how I understood the statement too.
There are some things which are not clear to me because I'm really not familiar with the procedure and what it actually means. So, my questions are:
- How important is the B sample and how long it takes? I was under the impression that it is done automatically after you have a positive result with the A sample. Evidently that's not the case.
I'm a bit confused with the wording here. RUSADA having the right to appeal to a decision they took?

But my question is, why is IOC appealing, only, and not also WADA and ISU?
Is it because since these are the OG, IOC wants to go for "better safe than sorry" approach, therefore better prevent her from competing rather than having to then take away an eventual medal from her, in case the violation is definitive, after the B sample results?
I hope I'm clear in what I'm asking.