MacMadame
Doing all the things
- Messages
- 58,870
Not really.And since she self-identifies as LGBT makes it even less likely.
Not really.And since she self-identifies as LGBT makes it even less likely.
You're not dumb. She says nothing about his music, she talks about whether people support him. Interpret it as you shall, but the day she wrote it was a big day for him.Maybe she hates his music. Hating Lil Nas doesn't mean she's homophobic. And since she self-identifies as LGBT makes it even less likely.
Sorry, I didn't know. But are you now also claiming that I would be FOR mandatory sentencing drug laws? Are you out of your mind? LOL. What do you do for a living, because I don't see how you could be successful at all in life with your poor instincts and attitude. Now the empathy is coming through, so if you're going through a rough time, we all did during Covid, I will extend to you some slack. And I'm sorry if I appear to be mean which obviously you do. But really? Look, the first thing you should accuse me of is being Homophobic. Then call me racist, transphobic, xenophobic, misogynist. Because my reaction to being called ANY of those things is well, silence. I promise to you that I am not homophobic. I think my husband would stick up for me on that. As for the other slurs, it touches/affects me the same exact way. I'm not, no one would even think I am, so I'm not upset, offended, or whatever. But please just always call me out that I'm a homophobe. Cool. Let's see how I can make this world a better place in spite of this limitation I apparently have against gay people.ShaCarri is lgbt isn’t she?
And I hppe you are kidding @ErikWilliam that you don't know what Rockefeller drug laws were. Because that's sad.
They were mandatory sentencing drug laws that incarcerated huge amounts of people.
The Drug Laws That Changed How We Punish
Forty years ago, New York enacted tough laws in response to a wave of drug-related crime. They became known as the Rockefeller drug laws, and they set the standard for states looking to get tough on crime. But a new debate is under way over the effectiveness of such strict sentencing laws.www.npr.org
Yes to that. I was on Match and another good one, but dang I was too scared to even reply to some people. Athletic build, no fats, no fems. I had no idea where I fit in. 6', 160#, so not an "athletic" build (compared to what I think what that build is). Fat? Well, I have fat on my body and you will never see a Sixpack on my stomach, so am I fat? And then the "fems". I truly do not think I am fem by any definition. But I can guarantee you my attitude and demeanor is "loose" and you would know I'm at least not trying to play 'straight'. No one would ever accuse me of suffering from toxic masculinity, EVER. (Well it looks like several HERE would, but I'm reading the room a bit better, and I feel badly for some of these people, I mean, we're on a skating page and they are acting this way to strangers, imagine how dreadful they must be IRL). Yes, online dating as a gay man was tough. As I suppose it is for all single men and women. Straight included. All races included. All nationalities included. All genders/nongenders included. What am I missing that I'll have to explain away after being accused of being hateful to.You are not in a position to personally understand the layers of self-hate within this specific community AFAIK, but there's a reason why 'no fems' 'straight-acting' and the like are so common. There's an issue now with plenty of LGBTQ not 'getting' the trans identity and constantly talking negative about it. There are layers to everything, within one's own race included. Your argument that it's 'less likely' is not actually true it all.
Now you are reaching. It’s pretty clear in that tweet from three months ago what the intent was and yes it was homophobic.Maybe she hates his music. Hating Lil Nas doesn't mean she's homophobic. And since she self-identifies as LGBT makes it even less likely.
People here love Skinner? Not many.She also said this in 2015 when she was 16. MyKayla Skinner was 19 when she retweeted a racist meme and people here love her. Oh I wonder why. She's a cute blond.
Great point. Maybe ShaCarri shouldn't even get a relay. Russia would be totally justified to scream favoritism or unfair if she were to compete. It's just so sad. It's sad she was informed that her birth mother passed away by a reporter. It's sad that MJ is a banned substance. And it's sad that she took a gamble and was quickly punished for it. She is an interesting person, has an interesting persona, should have been a US star in a few weeks. Such a waste.Lol it’s Olympic time!
Where stupid articles are written by journalists who know nothing about sports to catch the attention of people who will briefly care about sports for a week before forgetting all about it for the next four years!!
We can look forward to skating getting the same dumb treatment next year.
Meanwhile back in reality, can you imagine what Russia would do if the USA decided not to domestically enforce WADA doping rules?
Well not wanting black women to win is clearly not working when it comes to athletics.
There's a lot of takes that seem to be projecting US racial issues onto the IOC and other countries. Certainly there's racism out there, but the idea that this is about anything but an athlete doing something she shouldn't have is bizarre.Well not wanting black women to win is clearly not working when it comes to athletics.
This is confusing. As many others have pointed out in this thread, the list of banned substances goes way past weed. The articles being written are so narrow in scope, from people not knowledgeable about sports at all, and they seemingly think this is about weed only and specifically set up to target one demographic. It’s an international rule, not an American politics rule. The athletes are given advanced notice of this- and they make a choice.Doesn't mean they like it.
Yeah, and if you checked, I bet Michael Phelps, Ryan Lochte and Katie Ledecky have been tested twice as many times as rando athlete #10 too. Selective sampling like this does no good, in the long run, because as you say, the more times you medal, the more times you're tested. I wonder how many times Yuzuru Hanyu has been tested, or Aljona Savchenko, or Virtue/Moir...People are also now digging up the histories of how many times other athletes have been tested not even realizing that they are tested every time they medal. "Simone Biles has been tested twice as many times as rando athlete #10." Well, yeah. I mean of course she has.
I mentioned way upthread that I would be the first in line to get rid of the weed laws, but it's not likely to be something that happens quick because it's an international thing, international jurisdictions, etc. Even the US can't make up its mind about laws and they greatly differ from state to state. Many jobs still require drug screenings that certainly include weed, even if it's perfectly legal within the particular state. I know there are some bills trying to get rid of this-- but for now, that's how it is and people know what they are getting themselves into.I do think it is reasonable to ask, outside of this situation, why is marijuana a banned substance? This is different than saying the results should be changed in this situation.
What performance enhancing benefit is offered by marijuana that would be different than alcohol, which is not banned? WADA's mission is to keep the playing field fair, not to police the morality of athletes.
It's reasonable to ask if marijuana should be a banned substance going forward.
I mentioned way upthread that I would be the first in line to get rid of the weed laws, but it's not likely to be something that happens quick because it's an international thing, international jurisdictions, etc. Even the US can't make up its mind about laws and they greatly differ from state to state. Many jobs still require drug screenings that certainly include weed, even if it's perfectly legal within the particular state. I know there are some bills trying to get rid of this-- but for now, that's how it is and people know what they are getting themselves into.
I have followed athletics all my life. There have been black female sprint champions since before I was born. I have never ever heard any athletics fan or official say that they don’t like it.Doesn't mean they like it.
That’s because there are drugs that provide a better competitive advantage. Just like there are crimes that command longer sentences. This is not hard to comprehend.The thing about a one-month sentence is that it's admitting that this is a nonsense drug and nonsense suspension. A more serious drug would yield a much longer sentence -- see Tyson Gay or Justin Gatlin.
Performance enhancement is only one of the criteria for a substance being on a list. And depending on the discipline it could be seen as performance enhancing.They are the World Anti-Doping Agency. Weed is not doping. It has no performance enhancing benefits.
This might be an unpopular opinion these days, but most people who I have seen who heavily use marijuana recreationally are not people who I think are good role models.For something to be added to the WADA Prohibited List, it must meet two of the three inclusion criteria: a) it poses a health risk to athletes b) it has the potential to enhance performance and c) it violates the spirit of sport.
In 2011, WADA published a paper in Sports Medicine discussing the reasons marijuana and cannabinoids meet the criteria. Below are excerpts from this publication that address the three criteria:
- “Athletes who smoke cannabis or Spice in-competition potentially endanger themselves and others because of increased risk taking, slower reaction times and poor executive function or decision making.”
- “Based on current animal and human studies as well as on interviews with athletes and information from the field, cannabis can be performance enhancing for some athletes and sports disciplines.”
- “Use of illicit drugs that are harmful to health and that may have performance-enhancing properties is not consistent with the athlete as a role model for young people around the world”.
This is something that is infinitely more unfair that knowingly taking a prohibited substance, but the athletes in question are not media darlings.Namibian female athletes disqualified from Olympics due to naturally high testosterone levels
World Athletics says that women with too much testosterone have an unfair advantage though there’s no evidence to suggest as such.www.axios.com
Performance enhancement is only one of the criteria for a substance being on a list. And depending on the discipline it could be seen as performance enhancing.
Marijuana FAQ | U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA)
Find answers regarding marijuana’s position on the Prohibited List, its adverse effects on athletes, & information on marijuana legislation in the U.S.A.www.usada.org
This might be an unpopular opinion these days, but most people who I have seen who heavily use marijuana recreationally are not people who I think are good role models.
Alcohol is most certainly also banned in-competition.Then why isn’t alcohol banned?