Umm. You’re missing the point, dear. Context and rhetoric matter.
Since this is the US men’s thread and the title of the article is: “With comeback drama adding to the moment, Nathan Chen skates into a league of his own,” I’m going to ignore your comments about Hanyu except to say that just because Phil trashed him too, and at greater length, it’s not okay that he also dissed Jason.
With regard to the US men, Nathan’s fall is mentioned in passing, buried in the overall analysis and praise of his skate which forms the bulk of the article. Jason’s “[failure to] once again to land a fully rotated quad for the first time in his career” comes out of nowhere, without any counterbalancing discussion of what he did well. Frankly, Jason is used pretty much as a prop in this article - as the awed teammate who can’t even land one quad after years of trying - to emphasize Nathan’s brilliance and historic 5 quad achievement. Had this truly been a neutral, factual mention, the article could simply have stated that Jason placed 7th, or that he landed an under rotated 4S. Instead, the information was presented negatively as a repeated, continuing, career-long failure.
Incidentally, if the job of a sportswriter is to report what happens at sporting events, the failure to state that Vincent didn’t make the FS is a pretty conspicuous omission, don’t you think? But maybe he’s more deserving of rainbows and unicorns.