I think you need to take your own advice. Johnny Weir did place higher than Chan in the short:
6 Johnny Weir United States82.1042.9039.207.907.457.907.808.150.0025
7 Patrick Chan Canada81.1241.4240.708.307.858.008.258.301.0024
He was behind in the long. They were almost tied technically, it wasn’t a surprise that Chan would be ahead in PCS. Overall Chan ended up 2.5 points about Weir. I highly doubt there was some great conspiracy to put Chan in 5th over Weir in 6th.
Oh, and yes, I am sure Chan was nervous. Most skaters are nervous at the Olympics, especially at their first Olympics and even more especially when it is in their home country. So what?
Eh, hold your horsies ...

My comment was not a slam on Chan for being nervous.

To paraphrase Batman's The Joker (as played by Heath Ledger

)
Why so sensitive?
And just because I matter-of-factly mentioned Johnny Weir in a sentence don't mean I need to calm down.

From this vantage point, I'm realistic about past competitions and I'm able to honestly call it as I see across the board no matter who I favored emotionally at the time. 2010 was ages ago already, but yep it always seems like yesterday for true figure skating aficionados. Time in a bottle.
Anyway thanks
@mag for pointing out that Johnny was given a very slight edge over Patrick in the 2010 Olympic sp. Johnny still deserved to be higher in both sp and fp. It's very debatable that Johnny was contained in sixth place in both programs. No need for a detailed rehash, but Johnny was not well-liked by either the U.S. fed or ISU judges. By being himself and often speaking out and speaking his mind to reporters, Johnny did not help himself politically. And then he made some questionable choices over the course of his career that didn't help his rep with judges either. As I said earlier, Johnny was a bit conflicted competitively for a variety of reasons, some self-inflicted. Galina should never have messed with his jump technique. Don't try to fix what ain't broken. Still, although Johnny was not at his peak in Vancouver, he skated well and he should have placed higher. It was a victory for Johnny even being there, since USFS would have preferred sending Ryan Bradley, but Johnny had come prepared to battle at 2010 U.S. Nationals and he persevered to make the Olympic team.
In the U.S. and internationally, there was just a huge depth of talent among the men, which continues to this day. As far as what happened with the placements at the 2010 Olympics, the writing was on the wall with U.S. fed fully backing Evan Lysacek, and there was apparent widespread sentimental support for Frank Carroll as his coach. Also, Evan did deliver his best workmanlike determined efforts at the Vancouver Olympics, sans the quad that he didn't need but was quite capable of landing. As far as 'conspiracy,' please find another go-to characterization to throw around.

The placements were not a conspiracy, but they were definitely based on figure skating politics as much or more than they were based on how the skaters actually performed. As usual.
On the issue of Patrick Chan being so superior on PCS, that's subjective. Patrick surely had superior skating skills over everyone but even Patrick realized post-2010 that he desired to focus more on his artistic growth, especially with the example of dancer-on-ice extraordinaire, Jeremy Abbott, displaying his talent. In addition, there's no doubt that Johnny Weir was hugely inspirational to his generation of skaters as a very gifted artist on the ice, as well as an effortless technician at his best. And that's true no matter how many haters and naysayers continue to this day to look down on Johnny's rare skating talent. I mean seriously
@mag, just ask Yuzuru Hanyu! It's conveniently forgotten and purposely overlooked just how much Yuzu, as a younger generation skater coming up behind Johnny and veteran compadres, was significantly inspired by Johnny's skating in more ways than one. And that's not debatable.