PairSkater12345
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 345
There you go again with personal attacks.....lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I totally agree. Makes a big statement when Ashley and Tim aren't even on the alternate list. Ashley and Tim are no where ready. Why didn't the selection committee do the same with the Kinerims?I think it's really interesting that Ashley and Tim aren't even on the alternate list for four continents.
I don't know that it's a mystery. They're likely taking the time to work on the lifts we've referenced earlier .... making changes to make them more comfortable prior to Montreal. A pair can fall on a toe, and not get buried in the standings; missing a lift, as you know, not so much .... As to the rest of the discussion, C-G & L were assigned worlds based on the three-tier criteria set up by USFS; I hardly know what else the selection committee could or would do. As we discussed earlier, all of the top U.S. pairs save C & J have had many seasons to distinguish themselves. Their injuries, coaching changes, various issues with elements opened the door for internal politics or -- and it's the same thing -- perceived internal politics.I think it's really interesting that Ashley and Tim aren't even on the alternate list for four continents.
I totally agree. Makes a big statement when Ashley and Tim aren't even on the alternate list. Ashley and Tim are no where ready. Why didn't the selection committee do the same with the Kinerims?
???They won Nationals?I totally agree. Makes a big statement when Ashley and Tim aren't even on the alternate list. Ashley and Tim are no where ready. Why didn't the selection committee do the same with the Kinerims?
You make some good points.I don't know that it's a mystery. They're likely taking the time to work on the lifts we've referenced earlier .... making changes to make them more comfortable prior to Montreal. A pair can fall on a toe, and not get buried in the standings; missing a lift, as you know, not so much .... As to the rest of the discussion, C-G & L were assigned worlds based on the three-tier criteria set up by USFS; I hardly know what else the selection committee could or would do. As we discussed earlier, all of the top U.S. pairs save C & J have had many seasons to distinguish themselves. Their injuries, coaching changes, various issues with elements opened the door for internal politics or -- and it's the same thing -- perceived internal politics.
Course I do....every one should agree with their own statements unless you change your mind....lolYou're agreeing with your own statement?
![]()
Shocks be nice now like Jayar suggested. remember "My mission in life is not merely to survive, but to thrive; and to do so with passion, compassion, humor and style."Ummm, I found some intelligent conversation about 2020 U.S. Nationals to add to the more judicious and perceptive offerings here by actual U.S. pairs fans who are regulars in this thread and not trolls:
![]()
2020 US Figure Skating Championships Recap: Erin & Justin
A recap of the 2020 US National Figure Skating Championships by Erin & Justin. #USChamps20 The following skaters were discussed: Alysa Liu Mariah Bell Bradie...youtu.be
Justin Laem is a passionate figure skating fan who always offers intelligent dialogue via his Youtube account. At about 31:56 in the above video clip, Justin indicates he ran into Deanna Stellato in Mississauga and she responded to his query about how she ended up skating pairs with Maxime Deschamps in Canada. Take a listen...
I'm not familiar with Justin's guest, Erin, but she discusses the possible ways U.S. fed might go with the selection assignments (they recorded this video prior to assignments being announced). Very perceptive and objective commentary, albeit that Erin doesn't realize Timothy was a pairs skater before he partnered with Ashley nearly 4 years ago.
As we know, Ashley also competed in singles for many years, and Timothy was formerly a singles competitor too. Famously, they both landed on the pairs podium at Nationals as juniors in 2011, with other partners. Timothy had taken about two years off after his split with Dee Dee Leng (who had briefly partnered with Simon Shnapir before retiring). Timothy's tryout with Shnapir's former partner, Marissa Castelli, bore no fruit so he performed on cruise ships and saved a bit of money prior to fortuitously returning to the competitive arena with Ashley Cain.
Erin makes an astute observation that Ash/Timothy have a higher base value on some of their elements, compared to a few other top U.S. pairs teams. Albeit that having a higher base value means you need to successfully complete your elements. I agree with Erin that Ash/Timothy should consider going with a different throw than the one they've been struggling with this season.
Because the knierims earned both assignments and probably wanted to let them decide what to do. They probably wanted to give the other three teams an assignment as well so since there were only three spots available they had to split them.I totally agree. Makes a big statement when Ashley and Tim aren't even on the alternate list. Ashley and Tim are no where ready. Why didn't the selection committee do the same with the Kinerims?
...No jokes. I want my Calalang/Johnson U.S. Nats fp uploaded by NBC, AND I WANT IT NOW!!![]()
I still think they were offered it -- either outright or as an alternate -- and turned it down. If they didn't turn it down, I think USFS would have made them an alternate.USFS probably wants Ashley and tim to spend time between now and worlds to be more prepared than they were at nationals
What I have an issue with is sending C-G&L to Worlds over K&O. I don't see either team as having a better BOW of work than the other so therefore there is no reason not to go with Nationals results in picking who should go instead of C&J.
I think this sentence says it all.Of course the problem with numbers is that you don’t have flexibility and discretion to adapt to unique circumstances.
Still no first place fp by C/J has been uploaded to Youtube by NBC, yet we get Kayne/O'Shea's sp and the free programs of other second place finishers.
![]()
I think this sentence says it all.
But under almost any reasonable weighting of tiers and events, C-G & L would get the nod over K & O, or C & J. They would not get the nod if the "old" method of adhering to U.S. Championships results, except in the case of injury petitions, was still in use. That method helped U.S. Championships really crackle with excitement.
I think, maybe, yes, although I could be missing something.Would they though? C/J beat C-G/L at two head-to-heads with both of them on the first two tiers and the one on the first tier by two places.
Everything else being equal, that would likely have given them the win.
But in the IJS world, should we be using placements, which depend on who shows up, or scores? I would certainly look at completed program content and scores and not just placements if I were on the committee.Tier 1: Placements at 2020 US Champs -- K & O 3rd; C-G & L 4th. Placements at 2019 Worlds: C-G & L 9th.
Tier 2: 2019/2020 Grand Prix -- C-G & L 4th & 5th placements; K & O two 6th places.
Tier 3: Challengers -- C-G & L two wins; K & O 4th, 2nd placements
I don’t think they were offered both 4cc and worlds.I still think they were offered it -- either outright or as an alternate -- and turned it down. If they didn't turn it down, I think USFS would have made them an alternate.
I am one of the few that has no issue with C&J being passed over for Worlds, btw. The two times I've seen them skate live, they fell on almost everything. I don't think they are consistent at all. So I can see USFS being worried about losing another Pairs slot.
What I have an issue with is sending C-G&L to Worlds over K&O. I don't see either team as having a better BOW of work than the other so therefore there is no reason not to go with Nationals results in picking who should go instead of C&J.
But, really, I never complain when they go by the results at Nationals so I wouldn't be upset if USFS had picked C&J instead. Either C&J or K&O would be okay with me. It's C-G&L who are just a big "WTF were they thinking?" for me.
Can we please stop with the infighting?
Either the members of the committee disagree with you and did not look at program content/scores; or, since each criteria listed in each tier carries equal weight, they did look at them, and they still decided to nominate C-G & L outright.But in the IJS world, should we be using placements, which depend on who shows up, or scores? I would certainly look at completed program content and scores and not just placements if I were on the committee.
But in the IJS world, should we be using placements, which depend on who shows up, or scores? I would certainly look at completed program content and scores and not just placements if I were on the committee.