I'm also

at posts thinking that the Knierims were somehow "gifted" their Worlds or Olympics spot. Are you kidding me? And who the heck else is better? I loooove Deanna and Nate, but they did the best they could do. Tarah and Danny are fighting injuries, as shown by their withdrawal. Ashley and Tim can be great .... or not. As a poster on GS said, it's not like the US is leaving Gordeeva and Grinkov at home
Yeah I'm baffled by some of the posts here. I used to visit this US pairs thread so often, but in the past couple years it's just been frustrating to read and partake in some of the discussions. Anyone who pays close attention to pairs scoring knew that every pair at U.S. Nationals got a scoring boost, it wasn't just the winning team. Many of the teams were getting inflated GOE on their twist, for example. Among the top 3 from Nationals, the Knierims are the only ones whose International personal best is actually similar to their National personal best. Aside from Nathan Chen and our ice dance contingent, they were as obvious of a choice as we could have had for our Olympic/World team. Just because they haven't scored as well as they should have at times doesn't mean they weren't our team with the best potential to do well.
I hope USFS sends ALOT of pairs on ALOT of assignments this season. We need give them all a chance to compete and get a feel for their programs and see how they do in front of different international judging panels.
They always do. The US can't control exactly how many GPs their pairs get-- that's based on world standings and whatnot. But they always send plenty of teams to Sr Bs, including teams that maybe aren't so competitive internationally.
Their signature element 4 twist was mostly absent all year. Even the 3twist isn't scoring what it did.
Their 3twist has been scoring as well as it's ever had, except when they have an error on it, like they did in the Worlds LP. The quad has seemed to affect their triple. In their past two events, they've had issues with the 3twist twice, which is not at all normal for them. The point difference between 4twist and 3twist isn't great enough to make the quad worth doing unless they feel really comfortable with it (and it doesn't affect the rest of the program). I believe they said they did too many quads in 2015-2016, which is why they didn't try one until this year's Nationals. I'm not sure how wise it was to remove it from their Olympic Team Event LP at the last minute, as it may have caused some tentativeness and doubt in their game plan to creep in. But we need to remember how difficult of an element a 4twist is. Tarasova/Morozov have been competing it regularly lately but theirs is crashy in practice sometimes too.
I wonder why she seemed so wobbly today.
Yeah Alexa was really off in that long program, who knows why. She didn't look sick or winded though. Just a really off day. And it was unfortunate because their jumping has progressively gotten better lately and another top 10 finish was very doable. Even with several mistakes top 11 was very doable. That invalidated death spiral really hurt.
I'm not faulting Alexa. She has had a rough two years, but, they were given a huge boost at nationals to get the Olympic spot. They have never fully come back after her surgery.
They scored over 200 points in their second competition back from her surgery, pretty darn strong. She hadn't regained full strength at that point, but it was a fantastic Worlds for them. They were slowed this season more by Chris's knee. He didn't seem fully back to normal health until the Olympics. But they were always the highest US finisher in events anyway, as they have been since 2014. Perhaps Alexa needs a little more time, as she is still not far removed from a major health issue that required her to literally rebuild her body, but generally she looks as strong as she ever has. I don't know what was up with her in this LP at Worlds.
Scimeca-Knierim/Knierim defeated Yu/Zhang and Della Monica/Guarise at the Olympics. Which other American pair could have done that?
They also beat James/Cipres that day. And that was including a silly error coming out of a lift exit. Yes, they are somewhat unpredictable, but they truly are an internationally competitive pair, and I would say practically all of the top pairs in the world are somewhat erratic. Two of the pairs on this year's World podium counted big errors.
Don't you think if S/B had half the backing S/K did by the USFS they would have made the free?
The German team that was 16th was stronger. With so few pairs in the LP, not every decent short program skate can qualify. Even the 20th place team was very decent. And if Seguin/Bilodeau hadn't bombed, the qualifying score would have been as high as 65. Some people here talk about pair skating as if it's not even a sport, as if results have nothing to do with the ability and quality level of teams and you need some shady backroom shenanigans to qualify for the free skate. Deanna/Nate have gotten sent to plenty of internationals this season, including Skate America after a couple low scores, so the Fed has been plenty supportive of them.
S/K Have grown on me but the truth is they been held up by the United States all season long. They may be the best we have but continuing to hold them up and over score of them has not done them or the other teams we have out there any favors.
That doesn't make sense. Aside from Nationals, they compete internationally all season, so how does that indicate "the US is holding them up all season long"? You can resent them for scoring as well as they do, but they deserve credit. They've been our most consistently-high scoring pair throughout this quad, and it's because of the quality they have in areas where they're not making mistakes. Their twist and throws are bigger and superior to most pairs. Their pair elements (aside from this Worlds LP and to a lesser extent the Olympic individual event) are usually so good that they don't have to skate clean to get solid scores. And that, really, is the mark of a team with international potential, because most of the higher ranking teams at major events are making errors. But they're still scoring well anyway because of what they do aside from the mistakes.
I think one of the issues here might be that some people don't look at pair skating from an IJS perspective, they look at it as clean skates = good, mistakes = bad. And any time a US pair skates a solid program and maybe doesn't get a great score, some fans complain the US pair got robbed without considering where they fell short. It's just not that simple.
If I was making any policy changes to how team selection is done, it would be about how to fill the second pair spot (in the future if the U.S. earns it again some day). I would put priority on the team with the highest-scoring and most consistent SP. Bomb in the LP if you must, but at least get there!
Yes, with the qualification number at 16 and the field as deep as it is, the importance has become sending teams with the most realistic shot of getting to the LP, first and foremost.