@Frida80 that link to the daily mail article just takes me to some Amazon gift card spam?
The heck? How did that’s happen? Here’s the link again.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...ddleton-A-waist-Nicole-Kidman-look-dumpy.html
@Frida80 that link to the daily mail article just takes me to some Amazon gift card spam?
Not to be argumentative about the height issue, but I'm 5'7" and that's an average height. If you are looking at statistics in the U.S. or anywhere else, there's surely a range. I consider anything from 5'2" to 5'4" to be on the short side for females. 5'5" to 5'7 is average height, while 5'8" to 5'10" and higher is tall for females.
Sorry, very questionable.
As is the "I knew nothing about him"
"Facts are such horrid things!", Mrs. Johnson to Lady Susan Vernon, Lady Susan.Meghan said, "Because I'm from the States, you don't grow up with the same understanding of the royal family. While I now understand there's a global interest, I didn't know much about him and so the only thing that I had asked her when she said she wanted to set us up was, 'I have one question, well is he nice?' Because if he wasn't kind, it didn't seem like it would make sense..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wW2oLfsHMc
I think it would be nearly impossible to know "nothing" about him. I mean, he was in teen magazines when I was growing up.
But I know very little about him as an actual person. I think it would be reasonable to say "nothing". It seems strange to argue about the semantics of how much Meghan knew. She doesn't appear to have sought him out because she had particular interest. And there is the interview whe she kind of just shrugged with a "who knows?" when asked Prince William or Prince Harry- so that is some evidence she had given the idea of dating a Prince little thought, even as an imaginary.
It sounds like you've invented your own definitions of certain statistical terminology and are now insisting that everyone use your definition, not the real definitions.
Not sure about Kate’s head piece thing at the christening today! Looked like she’s channeling Anne Boleyn!
Kate, William, George and Charlotte arrive at Louis’ christening
https://dailym.ai/2J7b8pn
Hot question is, will @allezfred be flag waving for Harry and Meghan’s visit to Dublin?
It sounds like you've invented your own definitions of certain statistical terminology and are now insisting that everyone use your definition, not the real definitions.
I do wonder if Kate will be at the Wimbledon finals, especially if England somehow manages to make it to the World Cup finals. Maybe she and Meghan can do that and let William and Harry freak out back at home.
ETA: I think this is the first time I have seen a photo of Charlotte with a centre part. It changes her look quite a bit!
I noticed that. I like her hair swept to the side better. Still, she's adorable as always!
This Daily Mail article has pictures of the young royals (Kate, William, Meghan, Harry) at a Royal Air Force centennial event today. Both ladies look quite stunning!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...kle-joins-Royal-family-Westminster-Abbey.html
Meghan has the most exquisite bone structure in her face. She really hit it out of the park with this dress. It is most definitely navy, not black.
They do look lovely. Meghan's dress still does not fit well between bust and waist. With what her dresses cost I can't imagine she can't get them fitted correctly. Love the belt at the waist.This Daily Mail article has pictures of the young royals (Kate, William, Meghan, Harry) at a Royal Air Force centennial event today. Both ladies look quite stunning!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...kle-joins-Royal-family-Westminster-Abbey.html
That's taking their failure to stop and say hi mighty personally, innit?Now don’t cream your pants everyone, but Harry and Meghan just drove past me on my way home. I did not wave.
They do look lovely. Meghan's dress still does not fit well between bust and waist. With what her dresses cost I can't imagine she can't get them fitted correctly. Love the belt at the waist.