clairecloutier
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,660
An issue that has been discussed a little in this thread is how a couple of American historians have chosen to use the term "Indians" to refer to Native Americans in recent works. I came across this author note about it in the note section of Champlain's Dream by David Hackett Fischer, so I just thought I'd post it here. It's something I've been a little confused about, myself.
Throughout this book Indians are called Indians, a choice that after a generation of political correctness requires an explanation. A few years ago, I was invited to the Newberry Library in Chicago, to meet leaders from many Indian nations throughout the United States ... In the course of our conversations, I asked what they would prefer to be called. The answers were the same, from Apaches to Wampanoags. Without exception they wanted to be called by the name of their own nations. I asked what word we should use to refer to all of them together, and they said that "Indian" was as good as any other, and better than some. They used it with pride, and it is adopted here. The pattern of usage is now changing. In the United States, "Indian" is returning to favor without pejorative connotation. In Canada, "first nations" is still preferred, but "Amerindiens" is frequently used.