Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does this mean we will no longer see new $20 bills with Jackson on them? I have not read the article (can't do it at work)
Actually, I think that the proposed design puts Jackson on the reverse of the $20 bill, with Tubman on the front.It's high time that Andrew Jackson's tenure on our currency came to an end. Good riddance!
While Hamilton would remain on the $10, and Abraham Lincoln on the $5s, images of women would be added to the back of both — in keeping with Mr. Lew’s intent “to bring to life” the national monuments depicted there.
Welllll...as long as you lil' ol' ladies keep in mind you gotta walk five paces behind the MEN...
/sarcasm
I agree...Here's some more information: https://modernmoney.treasury.gov/
Keeping Andrew Jackson on the back while Harriet Tubman is on the front of the $20 really makes no sense to me.
I kind of like the symbolism (whether intentional or not) of Jackson being "demoted" to the back of a bill that has Harriet Tubman on the front.
I kind of like the symbolism (whether intentional or not) of Jackson being "demoted" to the back of a bill that has Harriet Tubman on the front.
That would be a clever play on history, but seriously, I think that Harriet Tubman, born a slave who escaped into freedom, then returned to lead many other slaves to their freedom, worked as a nurse and then a Union spy during the Civil War, and fought for women's suffrage is a truly heroic woman who deserves being recognized this way, more so than Rosa Parks, as iconic a figure as she is. JMO there are many American women who should be more well known and honored for their contributions, but I am happy with the choice of Harriet Tubman.It might have been even better if it had been Rosa Parks that was riding in front, but Harriet Tubman will do.![]()
Maybe, this is why Jackson is moved to the back, with Tubman on the front? (Actually, I like the way that women will be worked into the designs with some of the existing monuments ... for example, they plan on including Marian Andersen and Eleanor Roosevelt along with the Lincoln Memorial on the back of the $5 bill)
if our currency has faces of only presidents
Whether this is a political move or not (I disagree with him here), if our currency has faces of only presidents, I see no need to replace a president with a non-president.
And neither was Alexander Hamilton.Ben Franklin was never president.
For once I agree with Trump (shocking!).........
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/21/politics/donald-trump-tubman-bill-political-correctness/index.html
Why not create another denomination instead of replacing a former president on the $20 bill?
Whether this is a political move or not (I disagree with him here), if our currency has faces of only presidents, I see no need to replace a president with a non-president. There are many deserving persons in our history. If Harriet is only a start, I am OK with it, but it will be tough to come up with a new denomination for each person. So perhaps having two persons on the front and back may be the best solution.
Initially, she and her charges were safe in the northern US, but with a change in the laws, she had to go to Canada. Tubman then began and ended her rescues at St. Catharines; she lived there for eight years.