If this is in response to what I wrote allow me to give some context. My first post was discussing the chosen theme of G/P´s FD and how I didn't think they were putting their concept across well, that it fell flat, whatever.  Someone responded that they didn't think something had to be spelled out literally in terms of a story.  I AGREED with that using V/M´s and P/C´s FDs as examples of not telling the literal story (V/M) or not telling s story (P/C) but felt both worked.  Specifically with V/M´s FD, because this is the one you mention, I think you can still see the emotions and tensions in the two parts without knowing the story.  Then once you do it adds.  Another example is Bobrova / Solovievs FD.  I don't think it was obvious what they were doing, you make your own story or try to figure it out, then they explain it and you say "okay, I see what you are doing now".  What I feel with G/P´s program is that even after an explanation I don't think they show it well.
Btw...who is  this Tak who explained the movie to you?  
 @muffinplus
@muffinplus I am confused you think "shallow unsure edges" was a main issue I had with their program?  It came at the end of the list of what I thought were there issues.  I thought the biggest problem with them this season is that  the theme/interpretation is so weak that with their technical problems there isn't  much to latch onto.   I really liked her first dress though 
