judiz
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,314
It was probably this one.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...-coughlin-safesport-investigation/2632400002/
While I am not jumping to conclude the very worst about the allegations against John (we simply don't know), this statement from PSA was VERY poorly worded. They need to do better.The PSA has posted a statement on its IG. A kind statement about John and then a comment on working within SafeSport to create reform and support coaches.
ETA: Here is the direct link: https://www.instagram.com/p/Bs4adRzn_uz/
And I see the trolls and attackers are there, too.
The PSA has posted a statement on its IG. A kind statement about John and then a comment on working within SafeSport to create reform and support coaches.
ETA: Here is the direct link: https://www.instagram.com/p/Bs4adRzn_uz/
And I see the trolls and attackers are there, too.
While I am not jumping to conclude the very worst about the allegations against John (we simply don't know), this statement from PSA was VERY poorly worded. They need to do better.
It makes it sound like the PSA doesn't like SafeSport or that they want to change SafeSport in some way. I'm sure they meant they need to change their profession or their professional standards, but the wording is so terrible, especially after praising John. It could easily be read as "We're sorry that John got investigated because we really liked him, but we have to do what SafeSport says. In the future we'll try to protect coaches like John."As an organization, PSA is required to follow the U.S. Center for SafeSport’s rules and guidelines. The U.S. Center for SafeSport has ultimate authority granted to them by the federal government over all National Governing Bodies (NGB). We, as a skating and coaching community, need to come together with a clear and unified front that advocates for change and reform. PSA will do everything in its power to advocate and support our coaches in this effort.
This paragraph is what I am mad about in the statement:
It makes it sound like the PSA doesn't like SafeSport or that they want to change SafeSport in some way. I'm sure they meant they need to change their profession or their professional standards, but the wording is so terrible, especially after praising John. It could easily be read as "We're sorry that John got investigated because we really liked him, but we have to do what SafeSport says. In the future we'll try to protect coaches like John."
On the other hand I'm disgusted by the trolls attacking people like Johnny Weir and saying he condones sexual violence or some other bs (and all the likes those trolls are getting). No - he's just mourning a friend. You shouldn't need to word it like Mervin Tran did for people not to attack you for mourning someone.
I'm not defending the PSA's statement but that isn't what it said. It is quoted above. What you are reading is Willin's take on it.I think PSA is being too reactive. I did not like the fact they omitted skater in the sentence "In the future we'll try to protect coaches like John."
The phrasing in her article was total weasel words. She had no proof or sources or evidence. She used the word “believed”. She had nothing. She’s dirt.I think the TSL Christine Brennan interview is important in clarifying the situation and putting it into context. Here are some of the main points:
I will continue to add to this list.
- Brennan said her source was credible and articles were well researched. She has been a professional journalist for 37 years and would not have risked her journalistic reputation on gossip or rumors. It would be the “highest level of journalistic malpractice” had she known about it and not published it. USAToday editors make a determination on whether the sources are credible and double checks everything.
- There are currently three allegations, two are minors.
- Even though the people who reported are anonymous, the identity of the one who filed the initial report is well known in Detroit and the skating community. Dave talked to a former judge and there are judges who are very angry at that person. Dave questioned if that person will ever be able to compete again and that there is fear about coming forward now.
I'm not defending the PSA's statement but that isn't what it said. It is quoted above. What you are reading is Willin's take on it.
I was merely providing you with context of the allegation that was made in the blog post you originally questioned. I made no other comment about it’s veracity, legality or anything else.
Wtf if this is true that's disgusting. But I could totally believe it - some of the judges and coaches (particularly older ones) care a lot more about making sure figure skating is a respected sport than protecting the athletes. I've seen firsthand how some judges and coaches get pissed off at any suggestion that the sport is corrupt or the famous names of the sport are not good people. Not in skating, but in other fields, I've seen people get fired or threatened by higher-ups for reporting colleagues that are doing bad things because it threatens the image of their department or organization. This is something that needs to change.I think the TSL Christine Brennan interview is important in clarifying the situation and putting it into context. Here are some of the main points:
I will continue to add to this list.
- The 12/17 interim restriction was made public record by Safe Sport. Brennan said her source was credible and articles were well researched. She has been a professional journalist for 37 years and would not have risked her journalistic reputation on gossip or rumors. It would be the “highest level of journalistic malpractice” had she known about it and not published it. USAToday editors make a determination on whether the sources are credible and double checks everything.
- There are currently three allegations, two are minors.
- Even though the people who reported are anonymous, the identity of the one who filed the initial report is well known in Detroit and the skating community. Dave talked to a former judge and there are judges who are very angry at that person. Dave questioned if that person will ever be able to compete again and that there is fear about coming forward now.
- Dan Hill, the spokesperson for SS, said that SS is receiving emails and calls with threats. SS is overwhelmed and Congress is looking into it. Not every report results in a suspension.
- "An allegation does not mean you're guilty"
- Every coach at a USFS sanctioned club is a mandatory reporter.
- Brennan emailed Coughlin to give him an opportunity to respond and he gave a lengthy response which she quoted. She plans to keep covering the story and will go to Detroit in a few days.
While I am not jumping to conclude the very worst about the allegations against John (we simply don't know), this statement from PSA was VERY poorly worded. They need to do better.
Listening to the TSL episode (which I have thoughts about, but I'll hold back on those for now), it sounds like John being confused about what he was reported for wasn't as much that he wasn't told as he couldn't recall anything that stood out. Being sexual misconduct the behavior in question could be dirty jokes, inappropriate questions/dialogue, or inappropriate flirting - things that he might not remember because it might have been par the course in his day to day life.
The suit also alleges the organizations advised athletes to withdraw complaints of sexual abuse that they knew were truthful, offered to put athletes back on team rosters only if they withdrew truthful complaints of sexual abuse, and threatened athletes with consequences for failure to withdraw complaints.
And the alternative? He’s dead. If he didn’t kill himself then someone murdered him. Your statement is ridiculous.Everybody on the Net is responding as if it's certain that he committed suicide, yet if it's 'apparent', then nothing is confirmed, and we essentially don't know anything about what happened to him.
Okay I just reread Mervin Tran’s statement on Twitter and there seems to be some credibility to Dave’s statement that the identity of one of the reporters is known within the skating community.
Tran states: “I will probably pass by the victim(s) I’ve heard about, give a hug and sincerely ask, “How’s it going?”
On the other hand I'm disgusted by the trolls attacking people like Johnny Weir and saying he condones sexual violence or some other bs (and all the likes those trolls are getting). No - he's just mourning a friend. You shouldn't need to word it like Mervin Tran did for people not to attack you for mourning someone.