olympic
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,905
Between the holidays, cold weather and COVID sequestration, I have more than enough free time.
I was perusing old skating videos and watched Slutskaya's LP from 97 Worlds for the first time (I never watched 97 Worlds in their totality because a lot of personal issues were going on in my life at the time). Wow. That was quite a 3S-3L and but for the opening 3Z which had a deep knee bend, it was quite a barnburner. She even showed decent stretch and extension which I honestly never really expected from her.
The British announcers made a case that she could very well have wedged herself between Kwan and Lipinski in the LP and given Kwan the gold medal / world championship. In the end of course, the judges placed her 3rd and the Lipinski became the youngest world champ ever. But, the breakdown revealed that Slutskaya garnered 3 or 4 1st place ordinals, and the rest of the judges placed her 3rd.
Do you think these ladies were properly placed in the LP at 1997 Worlds? Should Slutskaya have been 2nd? I don't remember the exact marks but her jumps were the best of the evening while Kwan probably had the best overall performance. The British announcers kept on about Lipinski's small jumps. Slutskaya winning or 2nd in the LP would have brought her up to bronze (I think). As it was, she remained off the podium while Gusmeroli held on to bronze.
Just curious as to everyone's opinions ... Thanks!
I was perusing old skating videos and watched Slutskaya's LP from 97 Worlds for the first time (I never watched 97 Worlds in their totality because a lot of personal issues were going on in my life at the time). Wow. That was quite a 3S-3L and but for the opening 3Z which had a deep knee bend, it was quite a barnburner. She even showed decent stretch and extension which I honestly never really expected from her.
The British announcers made a case that she could very well have wedged herself between Kwan and Lipinski in the LP and given Kwan the gold medal / world championship. In the end of course, the judges placed her 3rd and the Lipinski became the youngest world champ ever. But, the breakdown revealed that Slutskaya garnered 3 or 4 1st place ordinals, and the rest of the judges placed her 3rd.
Do you think these ladies were properly placed in the LP at 1997 Worlds? Should Slutskaya have been 2nd? I don't remember the exact marks but her jumps were the best of the evening while Kwan probably had the best overall performance. The British announcers kept on about Lipinski's small jumps. Slutskaya winning or 2nd in the LP would have brought her up to bronze (I think). As it was, she remained off the podium while Gusmeroli held on to bronze.
Just curious as to everyone's opinions ... Thanks!