Skaters who are posting tributes without acknowledging the victims and skaters who like, or share those tributes are a part of the problem.
I have also found some of the skaters' tributes jarring, and I do think they may discourage others coming forward (if there are others). It is one thing to make a complaint against someone who is not widely known and respected, and quite another to bring a complaint against someone who seems universally loved by prominent figure skaters and coaches who are almost all paying tribute to him.
At the same time, I wonder how many skaters knew the nature of the allegations? The SafeSport website does not specify what kind of misconduct was being investigated, and it is only in today's USA Today article that we learnt the specifics of the allegations -- sexual misconduct involving two minors and an adult -- from an anonymous source close to the SafeSport investigation. These specifics may give skaters who were not aware of the nature of the allegations, pause.
Having said that, the allegations have not been proven, and this is where I find some of the language of those who have spoken publicly of the allegations problematic. The detractor who commented on KMT's tribute, for example. It is my understanding that Coughlin was temporarily suspended pending further investigation. The investigation had not concluded and so he cannot be labelled an "abuser" and neither had he been "banned." Since the USA Today article came out, however, I have seen others use this language. If I am incorrect and there is good reason to use it, please let me know.
Even if the investigation runs its course (which seems unlikely) and the allegations are found to have substance, I think it's important to remember that there are different possibilities regarding what is being alleged. It may be that he had a relationship with a seventeen-year old when he was twenty, or something similar. I am not excusing him (if he is guilty) but I am saying we do not know what the nature of the sexual misconduct was. I don't know how "minor" is defined: is it someone under the age of 18, or 16 or younger, for example, or how "sexual misconduct" is defined by SafeSport?