Some interesting thoughts in this post.
This is why the "grab the highest-ranking lady likely to never make it to 4CC" mindset does more harm than good. Rather than building strong pair skaters from the start, these teams are always playing catch up as the transfer learns pair moves and inevitably never brings the harder triples with them resulting in a breakup within 2-3 seasons.
I agree it's important for USFSA and the skating community to value pairs skaters as much as singles skaters, and to value the kids who are participating in pairs from a young age, and growing up in the discipline. However, the simple fact is that some of our most successful pairs in recent years have had partners (especially female partners) who switched into pairs at quite a late age. Scimeca, Kayne, Stellato, are all in this group. There are also current examples of this trend internationally, like Annika Hocke and Paige Conners. Also, the new junior team Feng/Nyman, who placed 8th at Junior Worlds in their first year together, are both newly out of singles. So it's not like singles
can't transfer into pairs and succeed (especially females). Although I agree we should be supporting the kids who are competing in pairs in the younger ranks.
I have said it before, but some sort of national coordinator is needed to oversee the chess pieces and assemble the right coaches and athletes more frequently during the season
Currently, Mitch Moyer seems to mostly play this role for USFSA. However, he's also responsible for other disciplines. A coordinator specifically for pairs is not a bad idea--if budget dollars can be found.
to 1. define and identify talent early on;
Not sure entirely what you have in mind here, and I don't have a lot of details on the process for how this is currently handled. My impression is that much of this happens informally, at the local level--i.e., when kids are interested in pairs, they let local pairs coaches know, who may help them find local partners. When it's older skaters who are interested, they may travel for tryouts. For example, potential pairs skaters often visit Colorado Springs during the early offseason for informal, or more formal, tryouts with potential partners there.
2. provide a support system to help pair and maintain talent,
Some support system definitely exists at the senior level. From what we have heard in interviews, our senior pairs are in communication with Moyer and/or other fed officials at the planning stages of the season to discuss known issues, etc. From what I have heard, there is also some involvement from the federation at the junior level as well, but I'm not sure the extent of it. This existing support system could possibly be formalized further.
3. review progress and programs against international standards,
This is one of the main purposes of Champs Camp and the program reviews there; but of course, Champs Camp is only for the teams going to GPs.
4. spread expertise because NO pair can afford to be deficient in jumping, in twists and throws, or in PCS,
In recent years, USFSA has run weeklong, or weekendlong, pairs seminars during the offseason w/top foreign experts like Mozer, Moskvina, and Szolkowy. These seminars are, I believe, open to all senior pairs. While not long enough to pass on all necessary info, this is a step in the right direction. More could be done, certainly, but of course it depends on budget.
5. assign opportunities that develops teams with potential but also lifts those on the cusp of being a competitive team at Worlds.
Most of our senior teams who are at all competitive internationally get assigned to CS events and/or senior Bs during the early season. Also, pairs are sometimes assigned to spring international competitions. The U.S. federation generally provides more CS and Senior B assignments than the Canadian federation, but less than the Russian federation. I think we are doing fairly well in terms of international assignments. In my ideal world, our senior pairs would be doing 2 CSs + 2 GPs each, or, if they do not have GPs, 3 CSs. But we're not that far from that. We could do better with our JGP assignments; last year, I believe one or two of those went unfilled, which is a shame.
There is no doubt that our U.S. pairs program needs some serious help and improvement right now. But I think USFSA has the basics covered, in the sense that they provide international assignments, they offer some level of pairs education, monitoring, and feedback, and they provide some level of financial support for the top teams. Let's just say, we can acknowledge that there is a level of professionalism in how the program is being run. USFSA is not ignoring pairs.
I feel some of our problems in pairs go to deeper issues that are hard to solve with a surface, or basic, level of administration. More money would help. USFSA's budget is limited, yet I've argued before that it may be necessary to divert more of it proportionately to pairs, if we hope to succeed.
Another thing that would be helpful is simply some better luck. U.S. pairs have had a serious run of bad luck in recent years, in terms of injury and illness, that have really stalled our progress. Our teams have been left in the position of mainly trying to recover and maintain--while the rest of the world is moving forward.