chapis
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,874
Okay this is a total misunderstanding. My words are being twisted or I did not express myself correctly :
I never said V/M +4 points was a mockery AT ALL. One poster said ISU wanted P/C to win. I said, if so, why V/M are getting +4 since it would have been so easy to put a level down? Never said it was underserved (I don't even think it), because they actually got +3 just on Base Value. I said that was the reason that statement was a mockery, not V/M score.
V/M got lower score because of the Rumba. V/M in the SD in Base Value got level 2 + level 3 in No-touch, that's 2.70 points. At GPF they got 81.50ish - 1.20 (Rumba lvl2) = 80.30. They got 80.50 ish. Almost the same if not for levels that they actually fixed in the individual. If you add all the numbers it makes their 83+ score in the SD. It's the Tech Panel, not the judges. (Plus at GPF they called out lvl 3 at first but upgraded).
You have to look at protocols, I'm almost feeling like one of those uber trying to defend something I certainly didn't say. I'm the one saying that I wouldn't have given P/C those scores in the twizzles.
EDIT : same for the Shibs, they got +1.5 thank to a level in the No-touch, and actually the whole No-touch was even upgraded in GOEs. Maybe they caught something we didn't on camera in the TE.
okay, I understand you. The thing is that is not the first time I read people thinking that the difference from the Team Event to Individual Event was suspect to favor to V/M, so with your comment, especially people saying that their rhumba pattern should be lowered again in the IE, I thought you are thinking the same like those people.