Veterans should not be held up and newbies should not be held down, or vice-versa.
Depending on the circumstances, the above can happen, but scoring is generally based on reputation and politics. I don't think it's ever as cut-and-dried as simply 'veteran' vs 'newbie' because too many other factors are involved. There are cases where favorites have been given breaks or placed ahead of competitors who may have performed better, as I mentioned earlier. Under the old system, very talented young skaters when new to the scene quite often did not receive deserving scores against veterans (Midori Ito 1988 Olympics; Michelle Kwan 1995 Worlds). That was then and things have changed a bit re the scoring and federation clout and politics.
I don't have any issue with veterans vs. newbies if performance level is consistent with technical ability and scoring is fair across the board, which it rarely is. Figure skating is never that simple. Politics and rep (in addition to how skaters perform on the ice) tends to hold more sway in how scoring pans out. It seems to me that Carolina Kostner is receiving a lot of credit as a veteran and a mature artist, despite her technical skills not being at their peak. Meanwhile, skaters who have talent but who may not have been as consistent over the years and thus do not have rep will be low-balled when they skate better than expected (and that's what happened to Angela Wang at Finlandia).
There are plenty of Russian skaters who are automatically lauded for traditional 'rep' and snobby 'aesthetic' reasons, or because of good skating skills, despite not necessarily being consistent technically, or interesting presentation-wise. I find Sotskova a hard-worker, but also a snooze-fest to watch. Zabijako/Enbert are long-limbed and nice looking but still have on the training wheels and are rather bland, which does not keep the judges from inordinately rewarding them. Tarasova/Morosov have it all, except for lousy programs and no on-ice chemistry nor captivating presentation skills.
I think 'newbies' who deliver on all cylinders should get the scores. On the men's side, newbies who perform great should get good scores, but that includes being accurately scored on PCS in areas where they have room for improvement.
Interestingly, in Nathan's case, the knee-jerk tendency among fans of other skaters has been to say that Nathan is weak on PCS, which I think is a clear over-exaggeration. While Nathan has had room for growth performance-wise, he certainly has always been far ahead musically and he's grown tremendously the past couple of seasons in his understanding of how to fill out and extend his movements vs some other skaters of his generation, such as Boyang Jin. With a lot of help and attention, Boyang has been improving the past few seasons, but he still skates over his music and he's not as authentic a skater artistically as either Nathan or Vincent. Of course, Lori Nichol, who is choreographing for both Boyang and Nathan this season, has seemingly been inspired by working with Nathan to create some similar music themes and movements for both Boyang and Nathan. Mikhail Kolyada is a gorgeously expressive skater, but right now his range seems limited and he's been inconsistent technically.
I don't see Nathan as a newbie because he's been competing and winning against guys older than him for a long time. Nathan competes like a veteran, and he certainly has some PCS chops. Plus, last season Nathan completely changed the senior men's landscape. I notice this season that Lori Nichol and Shae Lynn Bourne have brought out some of the wonderful aspects of Nathan's unique style and personality. Having seen Boyang's new programs, it certainly looks as if Nichol was inspired by working with Nathan to try and give Boyang some similar moves. I guess imitation is the highest compliment. But Nathan does Nathan better.
This mentality favors placing an athlete on an Olympic team for sentimental reasons,
Who was ever placed on a team for sentimental reasons, in your estimation? I'm not saying it never happened, but I'd like some examples from you. I gave you specific examples in my previous posts and you haven't mentioned who you are thinking of with your pronouncements. Any recognition that Jason and Adam receive will be based upon their talent and hard work and their worth as champions and exemplary members of Team USA, and NOT for any so-called 'sentimental' reasons. Neither did Ross Miner receive any assignments this year for 'sentimental' reasons. Ross has been busting his ass working hard and taking risks and trying to give it all he has in what is reportedly his final eligible season.