CNN had someone on ground in Gaza but they may have pulled her for safety reasons.
I understand if a news agency pulls reporters from Gaza for safety reasons, but they then have to be even more restrained and careful in their reporting. The MSNBC reporter was particularly bad. He wasn't just reporting on what Hamas claimed. When IDF said it was an errant rocket from Gaza, he basically rejected the assertion, saying that he didn't think Israel is a credible source. (But HAMAS is credible?) And this was almost immediate from a guy who is not in Gaza. These unsubstantiated reports based on the assertions of a terrorist organization are dangerous. The NY Times says that they report information as they receive it. But, if the information is baseless accusations and it takes time to get the real evidence or even a defense, that approach causes harm.