Bellanca
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,301
It only works once.I think you missed the point of this thread. Jeez, lighten up. I mean really. Learn to laugh a little.


Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It only works once.I think you missed the point of this thread. Jeez, lighten up. I mean really. Learn to laugh a little.
Ladies: Kwan 1st and Lipinski 2nd at 1998 Olympics (FS and overall)
Men: Chan 1st and Hanyu 2nd at 2014 Olympics (FS and overall)
Pairs: B&S 1st and S&P 2nd at 2002 Olympics (FS and overall, i.e. no tie)
Yuna Kim to be given her rightful OGM in 2014.
My heart immediately says Kwan over Lipinski in 1998...but I wonder if Michelle would have continued on for another 6 years stacking national titles and world titles/medals--not missing a podium for 9 years straight, a feat which is yet to be matched by anyone. Would the legend that is Michelle Kwan still be the legend if she'd won that title? If that answer is "no" then as much as I want her to have that OGM, I'd keep things the way they are. Ultimately, not winning was a bigger blessing for her. Tara and Sarah have those OGM moments but Michelle has SO MANY memorable performances and wins and she ended up being a bigger star than both of them combined. I don't think I'd trade all of that for an OGM...
I mean it was good but I enjoyed Carolina way more in both performances and, if I had my choice, I'd have given gold to Carolina and kept Yuna 2nd...but then Carolina would have received all of the hate Adelina got and I don't want that for my Italian goddess so I put her 2nd.
If it came that close in scoring, would you rather go with the artistry or technical scores?
Personally I feel like some of the jumps aren’t cleanly executed and yet they got higher scores just for the attempt. I would rather watch a well skated, beautiful program than one with poorly executed but difficult elements
I wouldn't equate bad technique with laziness. Skaters are taught technique by coaches at an early age. The majority of elite skaters have issues in one or more jumps.
Anyways, to answer your question. It depends on what you mean by poorly executed. There are well-skated programs to the viewers' eyes but there may be URs and edges with closer scrutiny. There are programs that are executed very well for the most part but there is one major mistake (fall or pop). There is also something to be said about skaters attempting far more difficult technical content with less than perfect execution than a skater who executes clean programs but with significantly less technical content. IJS is all about adding up the points. The differences lie in what the judges value and how they perceive the skater, which is very subjective. I think a close competition like Sochi is a difficult event to judge. Depending on how one manipulates the numbers, you can make a case for any of the three medalists. I am just surprised new fans got so outraged by Adelina's win like this kind of upset never happened in figure skating...?
True, I guess it’s hard to understand why one program wins gold over another when you feel more emotionally connected to the silver/bronze performance
I feel like commentators do viewers a disservice if they spend more time talking about emotional connection than about technique. Especially aspects of technique other than jump content and obvious errors.
Fans will feel emotional connections to skaters regardless of whether the commentators encourage them to. And different fans may have different preferences than each other or than the commentators or producers of the broadcast they happen to be watching.
If judges feel an emotional connection, that will affect their scores. But it's only a tiny part of everything that goes into PCS, not to mention all the technical side of what is in fact a highly technical sport.
Of course fans and judges and commentators might each feel more connection to certain skaters because of nationality or because of their human interest story or just liking the way they look or the kind of music/choreographic style they chose, etc. The only part that is supposed to count in the scoring is how well the skater appears to be connecting to the music and the movement and the audience during the performance. But that's the most subjective part of the PCS assessments anyway. So from a sporting point of view I really feel it's an extra special layer that deserves some reward when present, but not the main point of the competition.
I wish Usova and Zhulin had used any of their other free programmes in 94. They were magnificent and that programme didn’t do them justice. I felt M&D should have won the OG again 94 I can’t help feeling that they were hampered by the their lacklustre performance in the EuropeansGold for M & D in '94. Gold for U & Z in '94 but with the caveat that they would have had a different free that suited them better (although I haven't watched their '94 free in literally decades and wonder if I might like it better now that I am older). Ok maybe that's not how this thread works but it's MY wish so...
Gold for S & K at 2020 Montreal Worlds. LOOK IT IS MY WISH, let's change all kinds of realities for the better while we are at it.
I'll save #4.
I agree with you there. The new rules and the poor choice of FD program did not do U/Z any favours. But I would keep T/D winning the OD, it really was exceptional. That said, the buzz created by G/P’s FD was fantastic and they got the crowd going. I so wanted to love T/D’s FD but I just...didn’tI wish Usova and Zhulin had used any of their other free programmes in 94. They were magnificent and that programme didn’t do them justice. I felt M&D should have won the OG again 94 I can’t help feeling that they were hampered by the their lacklustre performance in the Europeans
I agree with you there. The new rules and the poor choice of FD program did not do U/Z any favours. But I would keep T/D winning the OD, it really was exceptional. That said, the buzz created by G/P’s FD was fantastic and they got the crowd going. I so wanted to love T/D’s FD but I just...didn’t
I haven’t seen G/G and M/D’s performances in a while. It’s raining here today so I might get on YouTube!
I agree about G & P they generated such a buzz at the Europeans. I remember watching with my Mum and though we hand rooted for T&D we both preferred G&P. T & D FD just lacked some of their usual imagination and reworking it for the Olympics was a bit of gamble. I still feel disappointed in U&Z material for the FD as with their quality they deserved better. That being said I liked all of the top three RumbasI agree with you there. The new rules and the poor choice of FD program did not do U/Z any favours. But I would keep T/D winning the OD, it really was exceptional. That said, the buzz created by G/P’s FD was fantastic and they got the crowd going. I so wanted to love T/D’s FD but I just...didn’t
I haven’t seen G/G and M/D’s performances in a while. It’s raining here today so I might get on YouTube!
I'm with you on the first three, and my fourth and fifth are yours swapped.I guess I would use my wishes to right the wrongs of the more egregious judging errors or politik that I can recall from Olympic history -
1. Tim Wood - 1968 OGM
2. Blumberg / Seibert - 1984 OBM
3. Kerrigan - 1994 OGM
4. Yu Na Kim - 2014 OGM
If I had more wishes, my 1st 'alternate wish' would be for a healthy Babilonia / Gardner to compete cleanly at Lake Placid and even '80 Worlds, just to see where they would land. They could have won a 2nd world title at '80 Worlds in Dortmund [Rodnina was injured and they were essentially retired].