Catching up on this thread, and I've skimmed through a bunch of comments so my apologies if any of these responses repeat someone else's answers.
GPF :
1.Papadakis/Cizeron
2.Virtue/Moir
3.Shibutani/Shibutani
4.Chock/Bates
5.Hubbell/Donohue
6.Cappellini/Lanotte
Does anyone know how the starting order for the SD is decided? A draw between the 3 lower/3 higher teams ? Or simply reversed?
Nope. Don't know for sure. I believe we are back to the bottom three qualifiers in the first group & top three qualifiers in the last group for the GPF order, and I guess I had been assuming, in reverse order of qualification because the SDs for all the regular GPs have been in reverse order of world standings rather than drawn randomly in groups; but I haven't actually read the "reverse-order" bit regarding the GPF anywhere. I don't believe anyone has answered this question yet?
Tat does not have to have pull. She has eyes in her head. My guess is that she is familiar enough with the players that she saw--long before most people were willing to give her words too much credence--that Nikita & Elena register higher on the hot-mess-o-meter within their personal lives than Stepanova & Bukin. This doesn't necessarily mean that S&K won't defeat S&B at Europeans. Though, even if S&K do so, if you were the Russian Federation . . . which team would you send?
Looking at the
World Standings is interesting. Particularly the top ten. Do we know how the Olympic draw will be done yet?
Yes. There is a whole thread on it from a while ago, with kwanfan's very exact explanation. But the somewhat simplified explanation is that the bottom half of the Olympic qualifying athletes on the 3-year World Standings list go up during the first half of the Olympic short dance start order and the top half go up during the second half of the Olympic short dance start order. However, starting positions are drawn randomly within each half. So . . . it doesn't matter if you are ranked #1 or #9 on the 3-year World Standings list, as long as you are in the top half among the athletes competing, you will be in the same random draw for the final group
s in the SD at the Olympics.
Some fans, of course, will not remember this and will complain about the Olympic start orders as soon as we see them--but they should realize that there is no way the World Standings lists will be representative at that point in time, with all the top European teams having loads of points from Euros and the top 4CC teams likely not attending Four Continents to earn comparable scores.
Believe it's been updated, but the Shib's didn't do any B's which hurts them in the point standings. Monday was the 27th...
Yes, skipping the senior B events last season & this season hurts the Shibs' overall WS score; but for clarification's sake, the Shibs' overall score didn't update at all for SA because they already had the full number of counting scores from the past two seasons that were equal or superior to their points for the SA win. The win at SA this season does help them with regard to next season, provided they compete; but it doesn't alter their current placement for this season.
However, as mentioned above, if the Shibs stay among the top half of the Olympic qualifiers, they will be in the same random SD draw for the Olympics as all the teams above them on the 3-year WS list.
I mean we've had Olympic champions and medalists that beat superior teams just based on charisma and politicking. That's just ice dance.
People like to throw this accusation around regarding dance, but they don't agree about which teams were the "superior" ones and which ones won on "politicking." So the argument doesn't hold up very well under a microscope. Start naming names, and people will disagree.
And why shouldn't
charisma make a team superior? Charisma often comes from performance quality and interpretation.
It's very dull and generic... That music surely doesn't help!
I disagree strongly. The Shibs' FD is the most
personal one I have seen this season. But I can't write my essay about it tonight. Must sleep.