@clairecloutier a few years ago I think I'd have agreed but there is value in the institution for the country. But I dont think there is a tangible benefit to the so called "Commonwealth" countries.
@becca I dont think they can do anything that the Prime Minister cannot. Like what? They have no constitutional power as Johnson has demonstrated to chilling effect.
I think the concept of the RF providing stability is an illusion created by the monarch having served 70years. I dont think there is intrinsic stability in the institution.
I do think that the history and grandeur associated with the monarchy has a financial value from a tourist perspective although personally I'm not sure that value outweighs the costs associated with them. I dont think any decision to remove them should be a snap one. It should be carefully assessed on a cost/benefit basis like pretty much everything else in life.
I strongly believe that Harry was wrong to make the comments he did about his father and brother being "trapped". I think it is likely true - they effectively live in a gilded cage but that isn't his story to tell. But I think that life also has a "cost" to the individuals involved that should be part of any analysis. But its not like they could suddenly live like Joe Blogs if the monarchy was dissolved anyway. The Press would never allow it.