Just call me Harry. (Everything Harry & Meghan)

Status
Not open for further replies.
They appeared to get it at a bargain basement price - it was on the market for over $36 million a few years back and according to reports they paid less then $15 mill...

Is there something wrong though with getting a great deal on your dream home? Plus, I wouldn't call the approx. $14.7 million purchase price 'bargain basement.' The Russian owner purchased the property in 2009 for $25.3 million. Perhaps he later tried to sell it for more and couldn't or maybe he got a deal himself on the asking price at that time. It's been reported that he was trying to sell for awhile. So, he's likely glad to have found a prominent buyer at last, if even at a loss, because he may have been leaking funds annually on maintenance and property taxes. Who knows why he purchased it in the first place, and why he ended up wanting to sell. The rich are different, as the saying goes.

I'm not an authority on real estate prices, but I do realize that home prices in all ranges and areas fluctuate all the time for a variety of reasons. The Sussexes have the good fortune to have been able to conduct research and to take their time finding the right property in a neighborhood that meets all of their wishes and requirements, and probably then some! It's beautiful, private, secure, and has stunning views from all sides. It also comes with a ready-made children's playground. Archie is so lucky. Maybe his Cambridge cousins will be able to fly over for a visit someday, at a time when this current health crisis has been successfully resolved. In the meantime, the Sussexes are bound to be working on baby #2. :)

Now Harry does have a substantial fortune but as of yet no clear income...

Harry and Meghan both have substantial wealth as well as prodigious talents, abilities, and opportunities to earn more than an adequate income. Perhaps it missed your notice that they are signed up with a top-drawer speaker management firm, the Harry Walker Agency:

I'm sure they have a number of income-related and humanitarian-related projects they are planning, including Harry's mental health documentary with Oprah Winfrey. Meghan knows how to work hard, and she's also been wise about saving and investing her money, per the FF book. As well, Meghan is still receiving residuals from Suits reruns. :D FYI, MM was independently wealthy when she met Prince Harry. After falling in love and looking toward sharing a life with him representing the British monarchy, Meghan turned down renewal of a lucrative Reitmans fashion collection contract. She also shuttered her successful, moneymaking blog, The Tig; gave up her acting career; cut ties with her Kruger-Cowne agency reps; and put a halt on in-the-works talks for a cooking show and a cookbook project, etc. With less than two full years as a working senior royal, Meghan accomplished significant achievements for SmartWorks, The Mayhew, the Hubb Community Kitchen, Myna Mahila, Luminary Bakery, and British Vogue, etc. Harry, as well, from the age of 18, has a remarkable record of philanthropic work and development of beneficial ventures, including Sentebale, Invictus, the Endeavour Fund, WellChild, HeadFit, and the Queen's Commonwealth Trust, etc., not to mention stellar service representing his country in the military.

... the pics I've seen are from above and clearly from the air how do they hope to stop the drones etc coming in to take pics? I can see more law suits coming up unfortunately.

The area they have moved to hopefully has stricter no-fly-zone legislation and enforcement that is in full operational effect. I think M&H have demonstrated that the line they have drawn in the sand regarding their privacy and security is non-negotiable. They will surely do what they need to do until all the freakin' leeches and tabloid a$$hats trying to intrude on and monetize their privacy, get the message.
 
According to Meghan and Harry's nemesis, the Daily Mail, the new house has a stripper pole :rofl: and was formerly owned by a Russian oligarch who also owned the mansion where "Scarface" was filmed.

 
Last edited:
If it affords them the privacy they claim to desire then I suppose it will be worth it but as the pics I've seen are from above and clearly from the air how do they hope to stop the drones etc coming in to take pics? I can see more law suits coming up unfortunately.

I was wondering about this this too. It looks like there are trees around most of the house, but the front area is completely open, as are the tennis court, pool, gardens, etc. The house itself might be in a secluded and gated community, but a drone could take a lot of pictures of outdoor activity there.
 
I think I won’t read it. Not that Harry cares... ( :D ) but because I used to be such a fan of his I don’t enjoy reading all this stuff that makes me dislike them so much. And I don’t know if the papers have just picked the worst bits but from what articles say it makes them sound petty and hypocritical. I am sure the whole book isn’t so bad but I just don’t have the desire to read it.

I still read articles about them for some reason but a book just seems too much :lol:
 
Judging by reviews like the one below, any noteworthy bits have already been reported on extensively and the rest is just really sugary fluff.


I was actually quite an interesting review - but mainly because of the discussion about why Diana's flaws actually made her more relatable to a lot of people. Whereas apparently Finding Freedom paints a picture of perfection of Meghan. That could well be a sign of the times, though, as the artificial perfection of social media influencers is very fashionable now.

But things should settle down eventually. The media has had plenty of content served up on a silver platter, so lots of articles have been written that are quick, easy and cheap to produce.
 
I think all the thoughtful, analytical articles written by accomplished journalists are probably more interesting than the actual book.

But anyway, I just read some interview with Scobie. And for what it's worth, Harry apparently referred to the Queen's dresser, Angela Kelly, as 'this woman' ... LOL so honestly I think all of these players just need to get off their high horses.
 
I do wonder what would happen if the British tabloids spent half the effort hounding paedophile Prince Andrew. :shuffle:

Yes but it’s been decades since anyone has actually cared about Andrew in a show biz sense. Tabloids do the stupid show biz fluff. Actual investigative journalism is done by real papers.

Although the Andrew situation will give Meghan and Harry hope. In a decade or two the attention will have shifted and no one will care to the point where they will be able to do anything they want.

And another difference is that Andrew has completely hidden himself. Whereas Harry and Meghan just gave the tabloids a whole book and regular media releases to pick over and write easy and profitable click bait about.
 
And another difference is that Andrew has completely hidden himself. Whereas Harry and Meghan just gave the tabloids a whole book and regular media releases to pick over and write easy and profitable click bait about.

I thought they weren't involved in the book?

Andrew should not be allowed to hide but I guess, that's the advantage that you have when you're protected by whatever deal the royal family has with the tabloids.
 
Kind of a bad idea for me to comment on a book I have not read but the good news seems to be that it manages to put forth the feelings of Harry and Meghan without throwing anyone under the bus or creating a situation that would be hard to walk back from. They still seem to be prisoners in a gilded cage and I am not sure if and when that will change but maybe Santa Barbara will be the best place to try. I can see the possibility of many lucrative opportunities opening up for Meghan as well as chances to make her voice heard. Not too sure about those same opportunities for Harry but time will tell.
 
Yes but it’s been decades since anyone has actually cared about Andrew in a show biz sense. Tabloids do the stupid show biz fluff. Actual investigative journalism is done by real papers.

In Touch magazine broke the Duggar family abuse story, by tracking down leads (e.g. police reports on visits to the Duggar house) that no other media outlet bothered to look at. Admittedly that kind of thing is the exception rather than the rule, but there is the occasional bit of actual journalism from the tabloids.

And another difference is that Andrew has completely hidden himself. Whereas Harry and Meghan just gave the tabloids a whole book and regular media releases to pick over and write easy and profitable click bait about.

Andrew did that trainwreck BBC TV interview at the end of last year. Although that was so terrible for his reputation that I think the Royal family's media staff must have told him it would be better not to do that sort of thing again.
 
Perhaps I am naive but shouldn’t people care more about an alleged serial paedophile in the royal family rather than two self-absorbed and hypocritical couple spending too much on a house?

He doesn't appear to be interested in prepubescent children, so, bad as he may be, the term "pedophile" isn't applicable. I think this matters because if people misuse the term by applying it to children in their mid-teens, others will misunderstand the enormity of true pedophilia.
 

He doesn't appear to be interested in prepubescent children, so, bad as he may be, the term "pedophile" isn't applicable. I think this matters because if people misuse the term by applying it to children in their mid-teens, others will misunderstand the enormity of true pedophilia.

Statutory rapist any better?
 
Perhaps I am naive but shouldn’t people care more about an alleged serial paedophile in the royal family rather than two self-absorbed and hypocritical couple spending too much on a house?

Well, I think it's also because gossiping about tiffs about tiaras and lifts in land rovers to shopping trips and stuck up celebs is mindless entertainment and something that people can shoot the breeze about. (Particularly when there's no skating in sight).

But what do you say about Andrew? The whole topic is extremely delicate and one which I would never dare discuss on a forum. It's a completely different scenario to people just offering different opinions about a princess fighting over a diamond tiara.

But having just googled Andrew, all the articles are there to read. The Sun seems to have a steady stream of articles about it: https://www.thesun.co.uk/who/prince-andrew/ But I think definitely a topic for its own thread.
 
Last edited:
@starrynight I think we'd all appreciate it if you asked your questions in this thread instead of here:

 
But what do you say about Andrew? The whole topic is extremely delicate and one which I would never dare discuss on a forum. It's a completely different scenario to people just offering different opinions about a princess fighting over a diamond tiara.

Idgi. Do you think for instance that larry nassar should "never be discussed"? This culture of shame and silence is why sexual abusers get away with the shit they get away with.
 
Prince Andrew can be discussed in his own thread that was started for this very reason, see Vagabond's post above.

As for why there's more chatter about Harry and Meghan: because there's a gossipy book about them and it's fun to speculate about the lives of celebrities?
 
Idgi. Do you think for instance that larry nassar should "never be discussed"? This culture of shame and silence is why sexual abusers get away with the shit they get away with.

This is precisely why I don't like to discuss heavy topics on internet forums. One sentence vaguely on the issue and it's already been immediately twisted out of context to make me sound terrible.

Anyway. There's a separate thread for all of that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Do Not Sell My Personal Information