canbelto
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,974
Also suicidal ideation is serious. I still think the world would be better off without me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Meghan is not African American. She is bi-racial. I still think Meghan was disappointed to discover she was not on the top pf the pyramid and cried "RACE". Forgetting she flaunted some rather important issues of decorum. Tennis anyone? Ginormous baby shower? Meghan showed a blatant lack of sensitivity to the British people. And the royal family. And the criticisms of those actions had nothing to do with her ethnic background.
She identifies as Black.
And seriously, she was insensitive to the British people by having a baby shower? GMAFB.
I think the interview is unnecessary. This is Harry’s family. There are also multiple sides to every story.What makes people in this thread so sure Meghan is lying? Do you know them personally? I'm seriously asking, because you're very confident in your insistence that she's just couldn't possibly be telling the truth. And why is Harry's verson the same as hers? Is she controlling him?
And you are correct. From the US Census Bureau.People may choose to report more than one race to indicate their racial mixture, such as “American Indian” and “White.” People who identify their origin as Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish may be of any race.Interesting. I was under the impression that people could select more than one category for race on the census. I just assumed it was like filling out a URLA where you can select however many categories that apply (or none at all).
Well I felt like Harry was acting like a spoiled bratt with the whole daddy can fund me while I do what I wantSounds like the actual feud and rift is between Charles and Harry.
Please know that isn't true. Your life is valuable.Also suicidal ideation is serious. I still think the world would be better off without me.
Please know that isn't true. Your life is valuable.
Hugs. There is no excuse for not getting her when she was suicidal.I have to turn this off. I struggle with anxiety and depression and this interview is triggering.
If Harry is giving us a different context for the "skin tone" conversation than the one Meghan presented earlier in the interview, shouldn't that call into question everything else she has stated, how she is framing her responses to the interviewer?What makes people in this thread so sure Meghan is lying? Do you know them personally? I'm seriously asking, because you're very confident in your insistence that she just couldn't possibly be telling the truth. And why is Harry's verson the same as hers? Is she controlling him?
If Meghan needed care I am sure she could have had whatever she needed at home. Doctors and nurses round the clock to deliver all manner of therapy.Also, I said that it's believable they told her not get inpatient care considering the royal family probably thinks outpatient therapy is the way to go as it's what Harry, William, and Diana used.
The versions are the same because they believe it. Two people saying the same thing does not make that thing true.What makes people in this thread so sure Meghan is lying? Do you know them personally? I'm seriously asking, because you're very confident in your insistence that she just couldn't possibly be telling the truth. And why is Harry's verson the same as hers? Is she controlling him?
I just wish they would stay out.Hugs. There is no excuse for not getting her when she was suicidal.
I am really happy they got out.
But it does keep them in the spotlight.I think the interview is unnecessary. This is Harry’s family. There are also multiple sides to every story.
The security issue for Archie is ridiculous because security had been barred down for everyone well before Archie. And they were parring down the titles.
I don’t agree with airing family issues in the press. It’s not necessary. You say you want privacy well part of privacy is not dumping on your family in the press. It’s wrong.
I want to be clear, I have always felt like Meghan was the catalyst for Harry getting out but that he was actively involved in the decision. I don't think he was manipulated as if she was some Svengali or Rasputin. I do think that she figured out how they could exit and support themselves; but I also think he very much thought that they would not be cut off completely. And, honestly, they probably wouldn't have been cut off completely if they weren't running to the media to defend themselves all the time. It's like "okay, leave, but stick to the "never complain, never explain" mantra and you'll have your financial support." They didn't play that way and they got cut off and Harry can't quite believe that his dad actually held fast to the threat to withdraw all funding.Ok a lot to unpack here. I can't help but feel that once again, the woman is taking the fall for the man.
Harry in his short time drops some huge bombs -- he and Charles are completely estranged, not even on speaking terms anymore. But Harry seems sort of willing to push the narrative that he wanted to "get out" because of Meghan. Which -- honestly, the misogyny of these narratives is annoying. The relationship with Charles didn't get so shitty overnight. I suspect it's 35+ years of Charles not really being the father he needed to be for a son who was sensitive and emotional.
The "feud" between Kate and Meghan sounds like a huge nothingburger -- they exchanged words before a wedding. A stressful time, and Kate just had a baby. But Meghan clarifies it wasn't a big thing.
Again, Meghan seems to be taking the fall for Harry's decision.
And while it’s offensive they might also have not meant it as a don’t marry her.Reading some other comments elsewhere - it sounds like Harry has clarified that the question about skin color/tone was asked very early on in the dating relationship, not when Meghan was pregnant. It's still highly offensive but...
To answer:
If Harry is giving us a different context for the "skin tone" conversation than the one Meghan presented earlier in the interview, shouldn't that call into question everything else she has stated, how she is framing her responses to the interviewer?
They didn’t need to have this interview at all. Once again I am sure the royal family are not perfect but what is the point of airing this out in public what benefit. They left and if they wanted out why care about the title and do they know how much security would cost with them living in California.Ok a lot to unpack here. I can't help but feel that once again, the woman is taking the fall for the man.
Harry in his short time drops some huge bombs -- he and Charles are completely estranged, not even on speaking terms anymore. But Harry seems sort of willing to push the narrative that he wanted to "get out" because of Meghan. Which -- honestly, the misogyny of these narratives is annoying. The relationship with Charles didn't get so shitty overnight. I suspect it's 35+ years of Charles not really being the father he needed to be for a son who was sensitive and emotional.
The "feud" between Kate and Meghan sounds like a huge nothingburger -- they exchanged words before a wedding. A stressful time, and Kate just had a baby. But Meghan clarifies it wasn't a big thing.
Again, Meghan seems to be taking the fall for Harry's decision.
And just because you don't believe them, it doesn't make it untrue. I just don't understand how some here can speak so confidently like they know everything about it. This is a figure skating board. Nobody here is privy to the way the royal family really is.The versions are the same because they believe it. Two people saying the same thing does not make that thing true.
I want to be clear, I have always felt like Meghan was the catalyst for Harry getting out but that he was actively involved in the decision. I don't think he was manipulated as if she was some Svengali or Rasputin. I do think that she figured out how they could exit and support themselves; but I also think he very much thought that they would not be cut off completely. And, honestly, they probably wouldn't have been cut off completely if they weren't running to the media to defend themselves all the time. It's like "okay, leave, but stick to the "never complain, never explain" mantra and you'll have your financial support." They didn't play that way and they got cut off and Harry can't quite believe that his dad actually held fast to the threat to withdraw all funding.
No we aren’t and I don’t know what really went down. But I also know that Harry and Meghan are choosing to air their private family business.And just because you don't believe them, it doesn't make it untrue. I just don't understand how some here can speak so confidently like they know everything about it. This is a figure skating board. Nobody here is privy to the way the royal family really is.
Like I said last week, on the IQ scale, Meghan is, IMO, clearly the smarter of the two. Harry has never had to worry about anything in his life and, I suspect, gotten his way in most everything.I definitely feel like Meghan is more savvy on how to actually put bread and butter on the table. Harry grew up where money was never an issue. But again, I think inking the Netflix and Spotify deals are actually her work.
One thing I actually think was a good idea on the part of the Firm was for Meghan to continue acting. The depression women feel marrying into the BRF is a real thing, and maybe they felt that her taking some acting gigs on the side would give her day to day life more meaning. Honestly, it wasn't a bad idea. I've seen outtakes on Meghan at Suits and it seems like she really enjoyed acting.