The movie starts with the text:
"Based on irony free,
wildly contradictory,
totally true interviews
with Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly"
It's Tonya's version, and sure, it's possible she is making things up. I could agree with two things, and that is that it could emphasise this more, also that Kerrigan gets a raw deal.
Outside of skating fans, I have still to meet anyone that did not like the hell out of this movie. Though obviously I have not met every person in the world.
My point is that if you get too many hang-ups about what is true or not, there is a strong chance you will miss what it's about. Tonya Harding and the story are just means to make a movie. And she is a great interview, btw.
I understand if people who lived through the time are upset, but unlike with O.J. Simpson, people did not get murdered. I just can't find the fact that Harding gets lucky at this stage of her life upsetting, guilty or not. Maybe I'm just too soft.
Nearly 2,400 posts in, this thread has been about WAY more than just the movie I, Tonya. It's a little late for that statement.
Next, a comparison to Amadeus is poorly conceived. That film came out nearly 200 years after Mozart's death. Whereas, virtually all the people in I, Tonya -- except notably Shawn Eckhardt -- are still alive. How should Nancy Kerrigan feel about a movie that mocks her and tells a slanted version of the story of someone who may have been involved in the assault on Kerrigan? And what of Eckhardt's family? We all know he was a buffoon, but in I, Tonya pretty much sole responsibility for the attack on Kerrigan is put on him.
I don't think just because Salieri is dead, making a movie which completely makes up a story (well, the play it's based on did that) that has a whole world thinking that he killed one of the greatest geniuses that ever lived is THAT different, actually. It's a pretty big deal to have on someone's resume, even post-life. The example of accepting storytelling that is not true (and here there is not even a debate about truth) to catch a movie's message is pretty much the same. If somebody said to you now, "hey, in 200 years there will be a movie which will be seen by everybody, and it will make them believe you killed ...... (fill in whatever name that is one of the greatest on our planet) can you sign here"? Would you sign?