So are we not referring to the dance form and instead mean contemporary as in ‘new’ or ‘recent’ or ‘innovative’? Because Le Parc and/or a lyrical style in ice dance have been around a long time! I apologise if I’ve understood but I think the point stands either way.
ETA: I was taught by my English teacher never to capitalise genres, not in music or dance or literature. So ‘contemporary’ has always been a small c to me and was when I was dancing it. I do not know if this is actually correct and am happy to learn otherwise if it’s not!
In terms of Contemporary Dance (and your points) I think we are agreed with regard to those respective programmes (though I think that Carmen break is maybe a bit towards the judges and narrative driven to qualify without reservation)
Although in terms of Contemporary Dance, don't you think there were elements of it in the P/C 2017 freeskate- , the entry in to the twizzles, the transitions between the twizzles and the Cist, the nod to each other after the Cist..... I would also say some of the transitions in Moonlight Sonata veer more towards Contemporary Dance.
Contemporary Dance isn't normally capitalised........ For me (for example) I would capitalise Minimalism if referring to the specific Western art movement, but not capitalise it if I was using it in a more general sense of thinking about non-Minimalist work of art that can be said to be a product of thinking about art in terms of "the minimal". I don't think there are hard and fast rules, but for me that is the one that makes sense.
Last edited: