It's chilling to read that this man abused his teenage partner for two years while living in her parents' home with her, then went on to spend the next 12 years at a high professional level within the sport. Bridget was abused over a long period of time, and it sounds like others may have been aware of it. Doesn't that scare anyone? I think it's terrifying, what else did this guy do to the young athletes he had access to? And yet in this thread, we have people psychoanalyzing and attacking Bridget's statements, criticizing her behavior, citing age of consent laws... it's sickening and it's all victim-shaming. We don't know what her life has been like since that time, or why she chose to come forward in this way. If Bridget says she was abused, it's not our place to say "no you weren't!" or "that's not PC!" Support her, believe her, give her the benefit of the doubt.
This. I'm getting the impression that people are ignoring context.
I'm not being obtuse or missing the point, I'm just wondering in what book does it spell out what's reasonable and what's not when it comes to grieving? What you want to label "terrible, rotten, harmful tribute posts", I call part of someone's grieving process. Maybe I've been to more funerals and since I'm closer to my reckoning, it's not so black and white for me.
Unfortunately, repeated calls - no, DEMANDS (because that's these are, make no mistake) for apologies and posts of support for the victims from mid-level skaters who donated to a gofundme to pay for a funeral for a father who cut his son down, DO constitute harassment and bullying in my estimation.
Yes, the skaters/coaches that posted tributes to JC were struggling with a tremendous amount of grief. A man they loved had died suddenly by suicide. Now I, personally, don't have any problems with people who posted something along the lines of "R.I.P." or "such a tragedy" or a black screen on their Instagram story. And of course, there were people like Mervin Tran whose reactions were exceptionally sensitive and nuanced. There are also people like Tara and Dalilah, whose response and behavior has been exceptionally atrocious.
However, for people who wrote extensive tributes on the amazing qualities of JC without so much as mentioning the allegations (i.e. Adam, Johnny, Grant, etc.), their actions contributed to a culture of silence. Issuing an apology, such as Adam and Gabriella Papadakis (another skater who gave an exceptional response) did, goes a long way in addressing this.
Here's another thing: I can confirm that several of the people who posted those tributes knew the identity of AT LEAST one of the survivors and the identity of the third-party reporter. I would bet that they all knew that John was being investigated by SafeSport and that he was given an interim restriction in December. If they have even a basic understanding of SafeSport, they would have also known that the chances that JC was being investigated for anything other than sexual misconduct were very slim. They should have posted responsibly. They didn't. They now have the opportunity to apologize and to do better in the future. They should take it.
In regards to Bridget's comments, I'm MUCH more forgiving. Based on her FB post, I'm assuming that she has knowledge of, or has even been in communication with, many of the other survivors. Once you dig deeper into all of their cases, it becomes harder to believe that the people who publicly expressed support for JC (in the form of tribute posts, post-legal fees GoFundMe donations, red hats, etc.) really had no idea what was going on.