And IAM had nothing to lose by staying loyal beyond fan opinion. The judges already give their teams so much more benefit of the doubt - their teams win everything in sight. Skaters are still going to go there and pay them a ton of money for training because it's so apparent that IAM is the only way to get a medal these days. Fan opinion doesn't pay their bills.I think IAM didn't need to be so fervent in their support of Nikolaj, absolutely. I'm sure it's part loyalty, disbelief in who he is, etc. Also, Marie France & Patrice are not so young to avoid bad attitudes about Sexual Assault. (And I've had at least two friends tell me it's a "Quebec thing", which...)
I also think coaches stay loyal to their students pragmatically as well, when it's in the investigation stage. It's a question of do they lose more potential students by staying loyal, or by tossing out the accused? In skating, I don't know the answer regardless of what I think it should be.
To me, the IAM of it all underlines how things need to keep evolving in skating, and I think this decision by OSIC is a step in the right direction. Canada and the US are maligned for not taking things like this seriously enough, and it's fair. But other Federations/nations in the ISU are much worse, and I'm not talking small ones. This school was considered a step away from the North American Russian schools, where all sorts of stories have come out about partner abuse, etc. And it turns out, it wasn't enough of a step away.