Sorry, but I literally don’t understand what the problem is with this. Cipres’ actions are what equally put a halt to James’ career, and now she’s back and he wishes her well. They were all athletes that knew each other.
With all due respect, that doesn't mean people aren't allowed to be angry about what he did and the way he's carrying himself. You may not see it as a big deal, but it's subjective and some people really do find what he did to be appalling and absolutely disgusting. Further, not everyone is as aware of what "other people who are actually still working in skating" have done or they aren't aware of any continued social media posts they're making.
They can be angry and they can think it was the worst thing in the world, but saying he ‘literally had the audacity’ to wish her well (something positive when her career was abruptly stopped) is kinda
He’s still on social media, he’s still liking a lot of skating-related stuff and encouraging many skaters from what I see. There’s always the option of blocking said people so you don’t have to see their activity IMO. 
www.instagram.com
Well first off, Staviyski's incident happened about 12 years ago. Many skating fans, and most of whom who are engaged on social media, were only more-or-less 10 years old when that happened. They don't have any idea. I myself was a big fan of his BUT I have no idea what he's done or what's been doing in the past decade or so. I may have commented on his participation in some cheesy skating with celebrity show and said he was still porny, but that was also a long time ago. I probably wouldn't be commenting as much now that I'm older and think drunk driving is more important than I did when I was more careless and younger. Still, I never have come across any of his postings or his actions for me to react.They can be angry and they can think it was the worst thing in the world, but saying he ‘literally had the audacity’ to wish her well (something positive when her career was abruptly stopped) is kinda
And I think many people have forgotten about Staviyski’s incident, first and foremost.
I would say it's more that she isn't happy with how she was told about it.
Show/professional opportunities just aren't there at the moment due to the CV situation. Who knows when those might open up again. I really don't see how Radford can be blamed for seeking a different path, especially given such an amazing opportunity.Meagan has released a statement:
Login • Instagram
Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.
One thing I hadn’t even thought about is how she did indeed skate in tours with Eric while she was pregnant.Meagan has released a statement:
Login • Instagram
Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.
Meagan has released a statement:
Login • Instagram
Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.
I'm sorry but Radford hasn't done anything to breach any "verbal" agreement they once had. Skate in shows "as long as possible" is very vague. Unless they were signed up to some actual shows and he breached the agreement by canceling on them to skate with James competitively, he didn't do anything wrong. Now, Meagan probably felt like she and Radford had each other forever, and he would be available when she would be, but that's not how life works. This is why partnerships need a contract with explicit unambiguous terms.Meagan has released a statement:
Login • Instagram
Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.
The shade!!Meagan has released a statement:
Login • Instagram
Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.
Agreed, it shows exactly why Eric didn't reach out about competing with her again. It's sad when you lose your partner, but at the same time, throwing shade like this only makes her look worse.
I think that is precisely the difference.
Yes she has every right to and anyone seeing how she's handling it has every right to think whatever they think etc etc.
I also have to say it’s somewhat interesting that this has happened with Charlie Bilodeau twice, and he came out almost unanimously as the villain both times. I don’t know of anyone who really supported him, actually. I also don’t remember anyone shaming Lubov for making the comments she did to IFS or whichever other media outlets to share her side of the story.
You could say the difference was that Meagan and Eric were not skating competitively in the moment and that CV stopped tours, but the act of deciding things before informing the partner remains the same here, at least from what Duhamel has posted. But again, even Lubov cleared up that Bilodeau went behind the scenes way prior to letting her know.
So is the difference here okay because of CV making things unpredictable? Or maybe people just don’t like Duhamel’s skating
In no way is this statement shade.
Again, not shade. Meagan is many things, but subtle and indirect are not two of them.
While I don't disagree, I just know that they were both very close all throughout their competitive days and even in their post-competitive days, so the story that Meagan has put out about not even knowing this was a serious possibility until Vanessa had taken the steps to guarantee she could skate for Canada makes it baffling that there wasn't strong communication. I mean, they were the best of friends and they won endless medals together. This wasn't a Krasnopolski situation where he gets tired after one season and just moves on, so I guess I would've expected some kind of discussions.
