See, I disagree about figures. Does anyone remember getting up at the crack of dawn to practice your figures on a small patch of ice? I found that stroking/edge coaches are much more important (and less expensive) to learn your edges instead of toiling on a figures patch for hours on end. It just seems as if some old-timers look back decades with fondness and a romanticized view of yesteryear. Figures were for the most part judged politically, ruined a skater's Olympic dreams, and really didn't help someone's SKATING. (For instance, Schuba was awesome at figures and was a very mediocre skater, while Lynn was terrible at figures yet her skating is legendary). It still boggles my mind that no one helped Surya on her basic edging and stroking, or that Mama refused to let anyone help Surya with such a fundamental requirement for good skating.
I guess everyone has their point-of-view about figures and the role that figures have played in the sport's development. But I'm gonna stay humble and realize that the actual history and resonance of the sport is too complicated, dense, and bigger than any of us to truly understand or unpack on forums like this, much less on snarky fs podcasts.
I'm glad there are people who love figure skating who don't frequent fan forums and are actually doing something about preserving the sport's history (shout out to
@N_Halifax). That list includes former U.S. pairs skater, Karen Courtland, and everyone involved in the effort to document and preserve the history of figures, while continuing to produce the recently formed World Figure & Fancy Skating Championships. Here's a link to some of their videos and to Courtland's explanation of their mission. It's so cool seeing former U.S. men eligible skater, Shepherd Clark!!! Pretty cool.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=World+figure+&+fancy+skating
Indeed, the issue of figures is complicated, and of course it's true that compulsory figures ended up becoming a politically convenient scoring tool. The sport needed to have better vision in the 1940s or earlier about the direction of figure skating once acrobatics began to enter the picture. But no, they simply frowned on acrobatics and continued to mindlessly over-aggrandize figures, without actually understanding the significance of figures in helping to guide the advancement of technical feats. With better clear-headed vision and leadership, those in power could have made adjustments early on to the sport's competitive structure (while still preserving figures in a separate competivie and historical archive capacity).
Of course, now, instead of overly revering figures while frowning on acobatics, the reverse has happened (forgetting about the forest for the trees, i.e, technical feats over foundational prowess, maturity and a true understanding of aesthetics). Also, poor Mom-Pop organization and decision-making continued right into the television contract era, where the ISU made bonehead decisions to accommodate the networks, without thinking about the best interests of the sport and the athletes.
That's not to say nothing is currently good about the sport. But whatever good we do see happening is definitely because of the athletes and other passionate, selfless people! Anything good that goes on in this sport occurs in spite of, not because of conflict-oriented, overly political ISU decision-making.