Wyliefan
Ubering juniors against my will
- Messages
- 49,764
Goodness, that would be a shocker! Well, Kaori's great and all, but I'm still rooting for Satoko.


Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.









I knew the minute that Mike Tirico pointed out that Nathan almost walked into the ladies restroom upon arrival, he was fighting some nerves and distraction. Oh, Nathan...![]()
![]()
Why was the cameraman following Nathan to the bathroom in the first place??? I didn't need Mike Tirico to tell me. I saw the clip with the cameras following Nathan relentlessly as he was looking for the bathroom. The broadcasters thought it was cute and funny at the time.
Come on, now! Nathan does not show many nerves and he always seems calm, but he's been dealing with a lot this entire season on and off the ice. The buildup can begin to take a toll. It's his first Olympic games and the exposure and expectations are OTT at this point. NBC needs to turn down the temperature on Nathan. Raf should figure out a way to allow Nathan to decompress and channel his inner yen and zone out the OTT noise. Seriously.Yeah, true!I'm not that familiar with Jack Gallagher, though his opinion of Kaori and the buzz around her is interesting. But this just sounds like clickbait to me, frankly. How can anyone know if Yuzuru is ready to win gold after what he's been through, and how little we've seen and heard of him lately?
Jack is a passionate Team Japan type of guy... He absolutely does wear his heart on his sleeve, that is why he is being featured in the Olympic teams cheer thread. Linked ^^^^^, more familiar names, Jackie and Phil... Both have excellent articles out today. Sure to please some, AND, positively sure to irritate others, as always!

Jackie as always offers straightforward, thorough analysis without slamming skaters. He tells it like it is, with a good eye and an adept, knowledgeable grasp of what he's talking about, without a lot of over-hyping or under-cutting the skaters. More insightful and reflective commentary can come later as the storylines continue to develop. It's way early yet.
If that's the case, who is Shoma blaming for his shortcomings at 4CCs and at other competitions this season? And would Shoma still be 'blaming' Nathan and Kolyada had they both skated lights out? To be honest, since there is a language difference, I'm going to hope that's not exactly what Shoma intended by his comments. The judges do love Shoma and consistently overlook his minor flaws, but athletes are definitely in trouble if they are allowing themselves to be overly affected by what others are doing on the ice. Not that how other competitors perform isn't a factor. It's just one more factor that's important to tune out when you take the ice yourself. Blaming other athletes for your own mistakes is unacceptable though.
Godalmighty, no! Please don't tell Nathan that.
Oops, too late I guess.
It's like Nathan is horseflesh and all these corporate honchos and network farts and over-the-hill sports journalists who mostly know big ball sports, put all their bets on this Kentucky Derby prospect/ Triple Crown contender. Influential people within the sport assured all concerned that betting on Nathan was a sure thing? Statistically and reputation-wise, it certainly seemed to be so. But such shortsighted bettors don't understand the sport and they don't follow it except for some 3 weeks every four years, and even then superficially.http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/knierims-short-program-puts-us-squad-second-place: Take a bow, Alexa and Chris! And I don't mean BOW!![]()

Yeeeooowwwzzzaaa!
The linked article also includes 'Chock, Bates in harmony with 'Imagine'
and say ... these early bird comp starts for the athletes ... 

Did you see his face when he finished or hear his interviews? He flopped and he knew it. He is known to be one of the best jumpers...his protocols have a 0 for a jump element and another across the board -3 GOE. He blew it big time. You say have some perspective, well, perspective matters in calling a flop. He and SK/K got the same number of points for the team, sure, but for him it was with one of his worst skates and we'll behind what he should have done. Whereas they exceeded expectations.
I didn't say 'no see-e no flop' two days ago in the 'Nathan OTT expectations' watch.
Just not a 'complete' flop -- a 'flop' nonetheless by Nathan's high standards and by everyone's gigantic, ginormous OTT NBC and Phil Hersh-sized expectations, obviously. 
And it's nearly time for the rest of the team event story: 
... Mark Zeigler wrote a follow-up article titled "Knierims bail out US in Olympic team skating event": http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sports/sd-sp-olympics-knierim-skating-team-20180208-story.html
aftershocks said:Great that the Knierims skated their best and some other pairs who could have landed in front of them, made some errors. But a little perspective in that Nathan did not completely 'flop.' Nathan actually set a record for landing the first quad-flip at an Olympics. He made two bad errors, one crucially significant because he lost a huge amount of points that could have had him at least in second place. The fall on the 3-axel was further damaging points-wise. But Nathan still managed to gain 7 points, the same amount of points the Knierims were awarded.
The difference [i.e. 'flop' factor] is that Nathan was expected to get 9 or 10 points which would have the U.S. team at 16 or tied for first at 17 total points. So indeed, it was crucially important when the Knierims got at least 2 points better than what might have been expected of them going in.
The Knierims' performance made a huge difference for the U.S. being in second place overall. And yes, Nathan's points are important too. It's not all bad. Japan and OAR are 1 point behind the U.S. and 4 points behind Canada.
If Nathan didn't flop, why did the Knierims have to place higher than originally expected? Nathan is expected to challenge for individual gold; his skate and placement - arguably the safest bet team USA had going in - fell far short of expectations, and could likely be the difference between 2nd and 3rd in the end. You don't need to reply and tell me every element he did well because he could have landed a 5lutz and all that matters is his placement and points earned.
And, no. 4th place in pairs does not equal 4th place in mens, and does not support an argument that Nathan skated well. How can you throw out context completely? Again, Nathan is expected to be in the top 3 individually. The Knierims are looking for a top 10. To get to 4th, they had to surpass tough teams, though I am sure you can let them know that J/C felt like phoning it in and that is why they were able to beat them. Give me a break.
The USA's sure bet for team points skated under expectation, and its weakest link delivered the best skate they could to make up for it. Can it just be left at that for once rather than making up reasons as to why their achievement was any less impressive?
albeit less than expected and less than the team strategy dictated. Why so OTT re mentioning a 5lutz which none of us will be seeing in any of our lifetimes nor in Nathan's lifetime, until and unless significant advancements are made to skate boot technology, and to the ice surface, not to mention superhero-like physical advances to skaters' bodies! 
There is no doubt about it.Clearly a number of factors confronted Nathan at his first Olympics outing in the team competition, but bottom line he seemed uncharacteristically distracted by nerves and the OTT expectations.