Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not inviting someone to a luncheon is not even close to banning something let alone censorship.In addition, the line between freedom of speech and censorship is very thin. For example, I also don't like cartoons from Charlie Hebdo. Their cartoon based on Harry's book, in my opinion, was disgusting. But do I think this should be banned? I do not know, but I suspect that this is a sure path to censorship
I don't think it's the attention from the paps that they are jealous over. It's the more legitimate attention. Like being invited onto talk shows to talk about your pet projects, having those projects promoted by the press, being invited to special events, etc.As an aside, if Harry and William do not like the constant pap attention, why would they be jealous when the paps pay too much attention to the other couple? In other words, if more attention is on Harry and Meagan, one would think that William and Kate would like the break??
They all say they do not like the attention but yet they do not like the opposite either (seemingly).
Have you read his book? According to his memoirs they walked away because of the constant hassle from the British media. They didn't want the attention that came with being royal as reported numerous times with direct quotes from them. Basically what the whole book is about is focused primarily at the tabloid BS that is the British media.Same with Cressida Bonas, to be honest. But, also, both of them had the sense to walk away from the hot mess that Harry clearly always has been.
I find it interesting that for those of us who read the book it’s actually not nasty against the Royals really at all but more a reflection on his own emotions and the brutality of the British tabloid media.It doesn't attack her legacy, though.
It's clear Harry loved his grandparents very much. He loved his mother. He loves his father, who comes across as mostly well-meaning, if maybe a bit bumbling. IMHO, the person who doesn't come out of this looking good is William.
But honestly, this is not the nasty book full of salacious gossip and hate that people seem to want to believe it is.
Same with Cressida Bonas, to be honest. But, also, both of them had the sense to walk away from the hot mess that Harry clearly always has been.
I am not Cressida Bonas or Chelsy Davy, so can't speak as to why they ended their relationship with Harry. But I'm not sure Harry's book is a 100% credible source on this matter, either.Have you read his book? According to his memoirs they walked away because of the constant hassle from the British media. They didn't want the attention that came with being royal as reported numerous times with direct quotes from them. Basically what the whole book is about is focused primarily at the tabloid BS that is the British media.
Did you miss this?I am not Cressida Bonas or Chelsy Davy, so can't speak as to why they ended their relationship with Harry. But I'm not sure Harry's book is a 100% credible source on this matter, either.
This isn't just Harry's opinion but the opinion of the women involved. They said they noped out on Harry because of the attention of the press.Have you read his book? According to his memoirs they walked away because of the constant hassle from the British media. They didn't want the attention that came with being royal as reported numerous times with direct quotes from them. Basically what the whole book is about is focused primarily at the tabloid BS that is the British media.
I guess better to be a sexual abuser of underage women than spill secrets. Tells me all I need to know about the BRF.It's so BRF to evict Meghan and Harry from a home only to offer it to ... Prince Andrew.
For a group that's supposedly obsessed with their press coverage, it's amazing how little awareness they have of "optics," as they say.
Did they plan to live there? Or better let no one live there?It's so BRF to evict Meghan and Harry from a home only to offer it to ... Prince Andrew.
For a group that's supposedly obsessed with their press coverage, it's amazing how little awareness they have of "optics," as they say.
It's a huge downgrade for Andrew, though. This is a rebuke, not a reward.I guess better to be a sexual abuser of underage women than spill secrets.
That's right. But @clairecloutier and @Spikefan wrote the opposite.It's a huge downgrade for Andrew, though. This is a rebuke, not a reward.
That's right. But @clairecloutier and @Spikefan wrote the opposite.
Andrew needs to live somewhere and they may have plans for Andrew’s larger house.I don’t care whether it’s a downgrade for Andrew or not.
What I was referring to is the fact that the BRF prefers to give this residence to someone credibly accused in court of sexually assaulting a minor rather than let it be used by Harry, whose sin is telling some unpleasant tales of family relationships. (And who also, I believe, personally paid for major renovation of the place by fully refunding all money spent on it.)